Polish examples and update README links to them #31
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@jackalcooper has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 15 minutes and 24 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
README.md (1)
6-8: Great addition of specific examples!The updated description and addition of specific examples for
defmfunctionality improve the README's clarity and usefulness. The links to the example files are helpful for users who want to see practical applications.Consider adding a brief description of what each example demonstrates (e.g., "Quick sort implementation using
defm") to give users more context before they click the links.bench/enif_quick_sort.ex (2)
82-82: LGTM: Consistent syntax improvementThe removal of the
callkeyword here is consistent with the changes made elsewhere in the file. It simplifies the syntax without altering the functionality.Consider renaming the
zerovariable to something more descriptive, such asstart_index. This would improve code readability:- do_sort(arr, zero, len - 1) + start_index = 0 + do_sort(arr, start_index, len - 1)
Line range hint
1-89: Overall: Excellent syntax improvementsThe changes in this file consistently remove the
callkeyword from function invocations, making the code more idiomatic and improving readability. The QuickSort algorithm's functionality remains unchanged, which is positive.Consider updating the module documentation to mention that this implementation uses modern Elixir syntax for NIF calls. This could be helpful for developers who might be comparing this implementation with older versions or other NIF examples.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- bench/enif_merge_sort.ex (3 hunks)
- bench/enif_quick_sort.ex (2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- bench/enif_merge_sort.ex
🔇 Additional comments (4)
README.md (2)
Line range hint
1-37: Overall improvement to README clarityThe changes to this README file generally improve its clarity and usefulness:
- The description of
defmfunctionality is now more specific and helpful.- The addition of links to concrete examples provides valuable context for users.
However, the removal of the SIMT support line without explanation might benefit from some additional context.
These updates align well with the PR objective of polishing examples and updating README links. Good job on improving the documentation!
Line range hint
10-12: Clarify the removal of SIMT supportThe SIMT (Single Instruction, Multiple Thread) support line has been removed, while SIMD (Single Instruction, Multiple Data) support remains. This change might be confusing for users who were expecting or interested in SIMT support.
Could you please provide some context for this change? Consider adding a brief explanation in the README about why SIMT support was removed or if it's planned for future implementation. This will help users understand the current state and future direction of the project.
To verify if SIMT is mentioned elsewhere in the project, you can run the following script:
✅ Verification successful
SIMT support removal verified
The SIMT support has been successfully removed from
README.md, and no other mentions of SIMT support were found in the project. This indicates that the removal is consistent and does not affect other parts of the codebase.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for mentions of SIMT in the project rg "SIMT|Single Instruction, Multiple Thread" --type md --type elixirLength of output: 100
bench/enif_quick_sort.ex (2)
29-29: LGTM: Simplified function call syntaxThe removal of the
callkeyword simplifies the syntax and makes the code more idiomatic. This change doesn't affect the functionality and is consistent with modern Elixir practices.
34-35: LGTM: Improved readability and idiomatic syntaxThe changes in these lines improve the code in two ways:
- Removal of the
callkeyword simplifies the function invocation syntax.- Simplification of the
func.returnstatement improves readability.These modifications make the code more idiomatic without altering its functionality.
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation
defmfunctionality inREADME.md, including specific examples for "quick sort" and "vector add."Refactor
ENIFMergeSortmodule.ENIFQuickSortmodule by removing thecallkeyword.