-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 160
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
pressure is not density and weasdi is not snodi + #739 and #742 #736
Conversation
Since you are touching GFS_diagnostics.F90 can you please fix the typo in the description of wilting point 'wilt': fv3atm/ccpp/driver/GFS_diagnostics.F90 Line 2181 in a82381c
|
Will that change the results of any test? Changing snodi affects nothing since no test outputs snodi. |
I noticed the typo by looking at ncdump, so yes it will change the output, but I have no idea how many tests are affected. Ignore it, since this PR does not change outputs. |
@JiliDong-NOAA - Please confirm that I merged your changes into this branch correctly. |
looks good too. |
@SamuelTrahanNOAA physics pr was merged. |
This PR is ready for final review and merge. I reverted .gitmodules and pointed ccpp/physics to ufs-community's ufs/dev. |
…nodi + #2047, #2053, and #2056 (#2044) FV3 diagnostic fixes, CCPP fixes for model crashes, new PR template - UFS: - commit message in PR template (#2053) - fix hercules crashes (#2015) - CMEPS & FV3: Bad data from in CCPP CLM Lake physics scheme caused model crashes - Communicate changes to lake ice (Closes #2055, NOAA-EMC/CMEPS#105, NOAA-EMC/fv3atm#741) - unit mismatch (NOAA-EMC/fv3atm#736) - FV3: correct errors in diagnostic calculations - snodi had weasdi data in it (NOAA-EMC/fv3atm#736) - revisions to RUC LSM snowfall melting and accumulation (NOAA-EMC/fv3atm#739)
Description
PRs #739 and #742 are combined into this one
Fixes two bugs:
Fixes are from @tanyasmirnova
Issue(s) addressed
These PRs are included in this one. They can be closed when this PR is merged:
Due to #742:
Many ccpp-physics issues are closed, and two pull requests. For a full list, see ufs-community/ccpp-physics#139
Testing
How were these changes tested?
A failing RRFS test case.
What compilers / HPCs was it tested with?
Intel Hera
Are the changes covered by regression tests? (If not, why? Do new tests need to be added?)
Existing tests already exercise this code well. Sadly, no test can catch every possible failure.
Have the ufs-weather-model regression test been run? On what platform?
Hera.
Will the code updates change regression test baseline? If yes, why? Please show the baseline directory below.
All tests with "hrrr" or "clm_lake" in their name.
/scratch1/BMC/zrtrr/Samuel.Trahan/lakes/RT/NEMSfv3gfs/develop-20231207
Please commit the regression test log files in your ufs-weather-model branch
Done.
Dependencies