Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix tests + Remove scrutinizer #149

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Jan 13, 2025
Merged

Fix tests + Remove scrutinizer #149

merged 5 commits into from
Jan 13, 2025

Conversation

vjik
Copy link
Member

@vjik vjik commented Jan 12, 2025

Q A
Is bugfix?
New feature?
Breaks BC?

@vjik vjik changed the title Remove scrutinizer Fix tests + Remove scrutinizer Jan 12, 2025
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 12, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 10.15%. Comparing base (e4a6c26) to head (a3d1253).
Report is 15 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master     #149      +/-   ##
============================================
+ Coverage      3.01%   10.15%   +7.13%     
- Complexity      255      266      +11     
============================================
  Files            22       26       +4     
  Lines          1325     1349      +24     
============================================
+ Hits             40      137      +97     
+ Misses         1285     1212      -73     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@vjik vjik requested a review from xepozz January 12, 2025 16:30
@vjik vjik added the status:code review The pull request needs review. label Jan 12, 2025
@vjik vjik merged commit 0417e56 into master Jan 13, 2025
17 checks passed
@vjik vjik deleted the rm-scrutinizer branch January 13, 2025 08:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
status:code review The pull request needs review.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants