Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix de shouldUseOverrideKeyword para una property #309

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

fdodino
Copy link
Contributor

@fdodino fdodino commented Nov 15, 2024

No mucho más para agregar, faltaba chequear que el método fuera synthetic (lo que significa que se generó, en este caso por ser una property).

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 15, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.75%. Comparing base (1af8cf1) to head (8ade7dc).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #309   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   89.75%   89.75%           
=======================================
  Files          28       28           
  Lines        3172     3172           
  Branches      574      574           
=======================================
  Hits         2847     2847           
  Misses        169      169           
  Partials      156      156           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.


🚨 Try these New Features:

Copy link
Contributor

@PalumboN PalumboN left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🚴 💨

@PalumboN PalumboN merged commit e027a2c into master Nov 19, 2024
4 checks passed
@PalumboN PalumboN deleted the fix-#264-shouldUseOverrideKeyword branch November 19, 2024 21:36
npasserini pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 29, 2024
Co-authored-by: Nahuel Palumbo <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants