GEMINI SETUP, BETTER ERROR HANDLING AND COMPLETE CHANGE OF CHAT INTERFACE UI #38
Conversation
…acting with the chatbot.
|
@Rahulsoni9321 is attempting to deploy a commit to the Ankur 's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several modifications across multiple files. A new environment variable Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/app/api/summarize/route.ts (1)
Line range hint
14-22: Update Anthropic API version and headers for Claude-3The code uses an older API version ('2023-06-01') while making requests to Claude-3. Consider updating to the latest version and headers.
Apply this update:
const response = await axios.post(ANTHROPIC_API_URL, { model: "claude-3-sonnet-20240229", messages: [ { role: "system", content: "You are an AI assistant that answers questions about blog posts." }, { role: "human", content: `Here's a blog post:\n\n${content}\n\nQuestion: ${query}` } ], max_tokens: 1000, }, { headers: { 'Content-Type': 'application/json', - 'x-api-key': ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, - 'anthropic-version': '2023-06-01' + 'anthropic-version': '2024-01-01', + 'x-api-key': ANTHROPIC_API_KEY }, });src/components/Hero.tsx (1)
Line range hint
17-23: Remove redundant circle dimensionsThe
w-6 h-6classes in the circle's className are being overridden by the inline styles that set dynamic width/height. This creates unnecessary CSS rules.<div key={i} - className="absolute bg-white rounded-full w-6 h-6" + className="absolute bg-white rounded-full" style={{ top: `${Math.random() * 100}%`, left: `${Math.random() * 100}%`, width: `${Math.random() * 4 + 1}px`, height: `${Math.random() * 4 + 1}px`, }} />src/components/BlogChatInterface.tsx (1)
51-52: Remove debug console.log statementProduction code should not contain console.log statements. Consider using proper logging service for production debugging if needed.
- console.log(data);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (7)
.env.example(1 hunks)src/app/api/summarize/route.ts(1 hunks)src/app/layout.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/BlogChatInterface.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/BlogPostClient.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/Hero.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/Navbar.tsx(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (3)
- .env.example
- src/components/BlogPostClient.tsx
- src/components/Navbar.tsx
🔇 Additional comments (5)
src/app/api/summarize/route.ts (1)
41-41: Verify error status code handling
Let's verify that the error status codes are being properly propagated from the Claude API.
✅ Verification successful
Error status code handling is consistent with codebase patterns
The error status code handling in the Claude API integration follows the same pattern as other endpoints in the codebase. The code correctly propagates the actual status from the API response when available (error.response?.status) or falls back to 500 for unknown errors, which aligns with how other endpoints handle error responses.
Examples of consistent patterns found in the codebase:
- HTTP 500 for server errors (
/api/views/[slug]) - HTTP 400 for invalid requests (
/api/comments) - Specific status codes for known error conditions (401, 404)
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for error handling patterns in the codebase
# Look for other instances of error handling with Claude API
rg -A 5 "anthropic" --type ts
# Check for consistent error status code handling
rg -A 5 "NextResponse.json.*status:" --type ts
Length of output: 2644
src/app/layout.tsx (1)
79-81: Verify layout spacing across different viewport sizes
The removal of vertical padding from the main container could affect content spacing. While this appears to be part of a broader UI refinement, please ensure that:
- Content maintains adequate vertical separation
- The layout remains consistent across different screen sizes
- No accessibility issues are introduced by content touching container edges
Run the following script to check for any compensating padding in child components:
src/components/Hero.tsx (1)
11-11: Verify the visual impact of padding removal
The removal of py-20 padding might affect the vertical spacing and overall layout of the hero section. Please ensure this change:
- Maintains proper spacing between the hero and adjacent sections
- Aligns with the layout changes in
layout.tsx(removal ofpy-8)
✅ Verification successful
Removal of py-20 padding is safe and intentional
The removal of py-20 from the hero section is acceptable because:
- The hero section maintains
min-h-screenwhich ensures proper viewport coverage - The component is directly wrapped in
mainwithout additional padding - The internal elements still maintain proper padding (
py-2,py-4) for buttons and interactive elements - The
flex items-center justify-centerclasses ensure content remains vertically centered
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any compensating padding changes in parent/sibling components
rg -l 'py-\d+' src/app/layout.tsx src/components/
Length of output: 616
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the layout context around Hero component and its padding
rg -B 2 -A 2 'Hero' src/app/page.tsx src/app/layout.tsx
# Check the actual padding changes in Hero.tsx
rg 'py-\d+' src/components/Hero.tsx
Length of output: 1120
src/components/BlogChatInterface.tsx (2)
90-91: LGTM: Formatting improvements
The formatting changes improve code readability without affecting functionality.
43-49: Verify error handling with Claude API responses
Let's ensure the error handling properly handles all possible Claude API error scenarios.
✅ Verification successful
Error handling implementation is appropriate and complete
The error handling implementation properly handles all Claude API error scenarios:
- The API route (
summarize/route.ts) catches all potential errors and returns them with appropriate status codes, including:- Missing API key errors
- Claude API response errors with detailed messages
- Generic error fallbacks
- The component (
BlogChatInterface.tsx) correctly:- Checks response status
- Extracts and displays the error message from the API response
- Has a fallback error message for unexpected errors
- Maintains the chat flow even when errors occur
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Claude API error handling patterns in the codebase
rg -l "anthropic|claude" --type ts
# Look for error response structures
ast-grep --pattern 'throw new Error($$$)' --lang ts
Length of output: 216
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the error handling implementation in the API route
cat src/app/api/summarize/route.ts
# Look for error response patterns in the component
cat src/components/BlogChatInterface.tsx
Length of output: 7310
src/app/api/summarize/route.ts
Outdated
| @@ -30,10 +30,17 @@ export async function POST(request: Request) { | |||
| const answer = response.data.content[0].text; | |||
| return NextResponse.json({ answer }); | |||
| } catch (error: any) { | |||
| console.error('Error in API:', error.response?.data || error.message); | |||
| console.error(error.response?.data.error.message || error.message); | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Avoid exposing raw API error messages to clients
Direct exposure of external API error messages to clients could potentially leak sensitive information. Consider implementing a sanitized error mapping system.
Here's a suggested implementation:
-console.error(error.response?.data.error.message || error.message);
+const errorMessage = error.response?.data.error.message || error.message;
+console.error('Claude API Error:', errorMessage);
+
+const clientErrorMessage = error.response?.status === 401
+ ? 'Authentication failed. Please check your API configuration.'
+ : 'An error occurred while processing your request. Please try again later.';
return NextResponse.json(
{
- error: error.response?.data.error.message || error.message,
+ error: clientErrorMessage,
},
{
status: error.response?.status || 500
}
);Also applies to: 37-37
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@coderabbitai nice tip - @Rahulsoni9321 what do you think?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@tyaga001, glad you found the suggestion helpful! Let me know if there's anything else I can assist with.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Totally agree with this suggestion @tyaga001. We can create some customized error messages to handle above cases.
If we expose raw messages from the API provider, high chances the user won't be able to understand the error message, which might lead to a bad user experience.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Seems like the humans are having a chat. I'll hop back into my burrow for now. If you need me again, just tag @coderabbitai in a new comment, and I'll come hopping out!
| setMessages(prev => [...prev, { role: 'assistant', content: data.answer }]); | ||
| } catch (error) { | ||
| } catch (error: any) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error typing and message specificity
The current implementation has two issues:
- Using
anytype reduces type safety - Generic error message doesn't help users understand what went wrong
- } catch (error: any) {
+ } catch (error: unknown) {
console.error('Error in chat:', error);
- setMessages(prev => [...prev, { role: 'assistant', content: "I have encountered some error. Please try again." }]);
+ const errorMessage = error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'An unexpected error occurred';
+ setMessages(prev => [...prev, { role: 'assistant', content: `I apologize, but ${errorMessage}. Please try again.` }]);
}Also applies to: 56-56
src/components/BlogChatInterface.tsx
Outdated
| if (!response.ok) { | ||
| // throw new Error("Something went wrong") | ||
| const data = await response.json(); | ||
| setMessages(prev => [...prev, { role: 'assistant', content: "Error: " + data.error }]); | ||
| return; | ||
|
|
||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling structure and security
While the improved error handling is good, consider these enhancements:
- Validate error messages before displaying to users
- Define error response types
- Sanitize error messages to prevent potential security issues
+ interface ErrorResponse {
+ error: string;
+ }
+
if (!response.ok) {
const data = await response.json();
+ const errorResponse = data as ErrorResponse;
+ const sanitizedError = sanitizeErrorMessage(errorResponse.error);
- setMessages(prev => [...prev, { role: 'assistant', content: "Error: " + data.error }]);
+ setMessages(prev => [...prev, { role: 'assistant', content: "Error: " + sanitizedError }]);
return;
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
.env.example
Outdated
| @@ -1,4 +1,5 @@ | |||
| DATABASE_URL= | |||
| NEXT_PUBLIC_CLERK_PUBLISHABLE_KEY= | |||
| CLERK_SECRET_KEY= | |||
| ANTHROPIC_API_KEY= | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
let's add GPT, Gemini keys as well?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Are you planning to migrate from Claude to Gemini or GPT?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am thinking of open-source APIs to avoid unnecessary costs at this moment. I think Gemini have free or we can setup GPT-3.5 Turbo
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I am thinking of open-source APIs to avoid unnecessary costs at this moment. I think Gemini have free or we can setup GPT-3.5 Turbo
Makes Sense @tyaga001. Should I proceed with setting up the backend for the Gemini API and transitioning out of Claude, or is there a preferred direction you'd like to explore?
|
@Rahulsoni9321 check this example and see if we can implement it in our blog - https://www.nikhilsnayak.dev/bot |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 13
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (14)
src/components/ui/toaster.tsx (2)
13-15: Consider adding TypeScript types for better type safety.While the code is functional, adding TypeScript types would improve maintainability and catch potential issues early.
-export function Toaster() { +interface Toast { + id: string; + title?: string; + description?: string; + action?: React.ReactNode; +} + +export function Toaster(): JSX.Element {
18-31: Improve props handling and styling maintainability.Consider these improvements:
- Explicitly define which props can be spread to avoid passing unwanted props
- Move the grid gap styling to a CSS module or Tailwind class for better maintainability
- {toasts.map(function ({ id, title, description, action, ...props }) { + {toasts.map(function ({ id, title, description, action, duration, className, ...props }) { return ( - <Toast key={id} {...props}> - <div className="grid gap-1"> + <Toast key={id} duration={duration} className={className}> + <div className={styles.toastContent}>src/app/globals.css (2)
92-96: Consider cross-browser compatibility for scrollbar stylingThe implementation looks good, but it's currently webkit-specific. Consider adding Firefox scrollbar styling for better cross-browser support.
Here's how you can improve it:
.ChatArea::-webkit-scrollbar { width: 6px; border-radius: 4px; background-color: #6e6b6b; } .ChatArea::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { background-color: white; border-radius: 4px; } +/* Firefox */ +.ChatArea { + scrollbar-width: thin; + scrollbar-color: white #6e6b6b; +}Also applies to: 98-102
93-95: Improve code consistency and maintainabilityConsider these improvements:
- Remove the empty line after the opening brace in the second rule
- Use Tailwind's color system for consistency with the rest of the codebase
Here's the suggested improvement:
.ChatArea::-webkit-scrollbar { - width: 6px ; + width: 6px; border-radius: 4px; - background-color: #6e6b6b; + background-color: theme('colors.gray.600'); } .ChatArea::-webkit-scrollbar-thumb { - - background-color: white; + background-color: theme('colors.white'); border-radius: 4px; }Also applies to: 99-101
src/app/api/summarize/route.ts (2)
10-14: Refactor configuration for better maintainabilityConsider these improvements:
- Remove the non-null assertion (!) and handle the type safely
- Move the system instruction to a separate configuration file
-const genAI = new GoogleGenerativeAI(GEMINI_API_KEY!); +const genAI = new GoogleGenerativeAI(GEMINI_API_KEY); +// Move to config/ai.ts +const AI_SYSTEM_INSTRUCTION = "You're an AI assistant..."; const model = genAI.getGenerativeModel({ model: "gemini-1.5-flash", - systemInstruction: "You're an AI assistant, Who only answers..." + systemInstruction: AI_SYSTEM_INSTRUCTION });
23-29: Consider rate limiting and response size validationThe API endpoint should implement rate limiting and validate response size to prevent abuse and ensure stability.
Consider implementing:
- Rate limiting middleware
- Maximum content length validation
- Response size checks
Would you like me to provide an example implementation?
src/components/ChatSuggestions.tsx (2)
10-14: Remove unnecessary empty linesMultiple consecutive empty lines can be reduced to improve code readability.
export const ChatSuggestions: React.FC<BlogChatSuggestionProps> = ({ title, description, handleSend }) => { - - - - - return (
19-21: Refactor duplicate motion.div configurationsThe motion.div elements share identical animation configurations. Consider extracting these into a reusable constant or component.
+const motionConfig = { + initial: { y: 20, opacity: 0 }, + whileHover: { scale: 1.05 }, + animate: { y: 0, opacity: 1 }, + transition: { duration: 0.1 }, + exit: { y: 20, opacity: 0 } +}; <motion.div - initial={{ y: 20, opacity: 0 }} - whileHover={{ scale: 1.05 }} - animate={{ y: 0, opacity: 1 }} - transition={{ duration: 0.1 }} - exit={{ y: 20, opacity: 0 }} + {...motionConfig} className='px-4 py-5 border border-white/40 rounded-[14px] ...' >Also applies to: 22-24
tailwind.config.ts (1)
104-104: LGTM! Consider adding a comment to document the animation's purpose.The animation configuration is correct with appropriate timing and properties. Since this appears to be part of the error handling improvements, consider adding a brief comment to document where this animation is intended to be used (e.g., loading states, error notifications).
+ // Used for loading states in error notifications shimmer: "shimmer 2s linear infinite",src/hooks/use-toast.ts (2)
132-141: Enhance state management implementationThe current global state management implementation could be improved:
- Add type safety for listeners
- Prevent duplicate listeners
- Ensure proper cleanup
-const listeners: Array<(state: State) => void> = [] +type Listener = (state: State) => void +const listeners = new Set<Listener>() function dispatch(action: Action) { memoryState = reducer(memoryState, action) - listeners.forEach((listener) => { + Array.from(listeners).forEach((listener) => { listener(memoryState) }) }
1-194: Overall implementation reviewThe toast notification system is well-structured and follows React patterns, but there are several areas for improvement:
- Consider adding error boundaries for toast rendering
- Add proper TypeScript strict mode compatibility
- Consider adding customization options for toast positioning and animation
- Add documentation for the public API
Would you like me to provide examples for any of these improvements?
src/components/BlogChatInterface.tsx (2)
34-39: Enhance input validationWhile basic input validation exists, consider adding more comprehensive checks:
- Maximum length limit
- Content moderation for inappropriate content
- Rate limiting for requests
const handleSend = async (customPrompt?: string) => { const promptToSend = customPrompt || input; - if (!promptToSend.trim()) { - toast({ description: "Please Enter valid input." }) + const MAX_LENGTH = 500; + const trimmedPrompt = promptToSend.trim(); + + if (!trimmedPrompt) { + toast({ description: "Please enter your question or message." }); + return; + } + + if (trimmedPrompt.length > MAX_LENGTH) { + toast({ + description: `Message is too long. Please limit to ${MAX_LENGTH} characters.`, + variant: "destructive" + }); return; - }; + }
Line range hint
146-163: Improve accessibilityThe chat interface needs accessibility improvements for better usability:
- Missing ARIA labels on interactive elements
- Ensure sufficient color contrast
<input type="text" value={input} onChange={(e) => setInput(e.target.value)} onKeyPress={(e) => e.key === 'Enter' && handleSend()} + aria-label="Chat message input" className="flex-grow bg-[#09090b] text-white p-2 placeholder:text-[14px]..." placeholder="Ask about the blog..." /> -<button onClick={handleSummary} className='bg-white hidden md:block...'> +<button + onClick={handleSummary} + aria-label="Summarize blog content" + className='bg-white hidden md:block...' +> Summarize </button> -<button onClick={() => handleSend()} disabled={isLoading} className="bg-blue-500..."> +<button + onClick={() => handleSend()} + disabled={isLoading} + aria-label="Send message" + className="bg-blue-500..." +> <Send size={18} /> </button>🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 115-117: Avoid passing both children and the dangerouslySetInnerHTML prop.
This is the source of the children prop
Setting HTML content will inadvertently override any passed children in React
(lint/security/noDangerouslySetInnerHtmlWithChildren)
[error] 115-115: Avoid passing content using the dangerouslySetInnerHTML prop.
Setting content using code can expose users to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks
(lint/security/noDangerouslySetInnerHtml)
src/components/ui/toast.tsx (1)
83-83: Remove unnecessary 'toast-close' attributeThe
toast-closeattribute in line 83 is unnecessary and can be safely removed. TheToastPrimitives.Closecomponent already handles the close functionality.Apply this diff to remove the attribute:
{...props} - toast-close="" >
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (14)
.env.example(1 hunks).vscode/settings.json(1 hunks)components.json(1 hunks)package.json(3 hunks)src/app/api/summarize/route.ts(1 hunks)src/app/globals.css(1 hunks)src/app/layout.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/BlogChatInterface.tsx(4 hunks)src/components/BlogPostClient.tsx(2 hunks)src/components/ChatSuggestions.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/ui/toast.tsx(1 hunks)src/components/ui/toaster.tsx(1 hunks)src/hooks/use-toast.ts(1 hunks)tailwind.config.ts(3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .vscode/settings.json
- components.json
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- .env.example
- src/app/layout.tsx
- src/components/BlogPostClient.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
src/components/BlogChatInterface.tsx
[error] 115-117: Avoid passing both children and the dangerouslySetInnerHTML prop.
This is the source of the children prop
Setting HTML content will inadvertently override any passed children in React
(lint/security/noDangerouslySetInnerHtmlWithChildren)
[error] 115-115: Avoid passing content using the dangerouslySetInnerHTML prop.
Setting content using code can expose users to cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks
(lint/security/noDangerouslySetInnerHtml)
🪛 eslint
src/components/ChatSuggestions.tsx
[error] 23-23: " can be escaped with ", “, ", ”.
(react/no-unescaped-entities)
[error] 23-23: " can be escaped with ", “, ", ”.
(react/no-unescaped-entities)
🔇 Additional comments (12)
src/components/ui/toaster.tsx (2)
1-12: LGTM! Well-organized imports and correct client-side setup.
The imports are properly structured and the "use client" directive is correctly placed for client-side rendering.
1-35: Verify integration with chatbot error handling flow.
The Toaster component looks well-implemented for displaying error messages. Let's verify its integration with the chatbot error handling system.
✅ Verification successful
Let me gather more context about the error handling implementation.
Toaster component is properly integrated with error handling flow
The verification shows that the Toaster component is correctly integrated into the chatbot's error handling system:
- Properly imported and used in the main layout (
src/app/layout.tsx) - Successfully integrated in
BlogChatInterface.tsxfor input validation errors - Implementation follows a clean pattern using the
useToasthook
The component is being used as intended for error message display, with a clear example of input validation in the chat interface.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the Toaster component usage in error handling flow
# Check for error handling imports and usage
echo "Checking error handling imports..."
rg -l "useToast|Toaster" src/
# Check for actual error message dispatches
echo "Checking error message dispatches..."
rg "toast\(" -A 3 src/
Length of output: 768
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the implementation of error handling in BlogChatInterface
ast-grep --pattern 'try {
$$$
} catch ($err) {
$$$
}'
# Check for other potential error handling patterns
rg "toast\(" -B 3 -A 1 src/components/BlogChatInterface.tsx
Length of output: 351
src/app/api/summarize/route.ts (2)
25-29: Verify error message improvements
The changes align with the PR objective of enhancing error messaging, but let's verify the actual error messages shown to users.
✅ Verification successful
Error handling implementation is complete and appropriate
The code has proper error handling with:
- Appropriate error catching and custom error message creation
- Error logging for debugging (
console.error) - User-friendly error message returned in the response
- Correct HTTP status code handling (
error.response?.status || 500)
The implementation aligns with good error handling practices and provides a clean error response structure:
{
"error": "Internal Server Error. Please try again after some time.",
"success": false
}🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for other error messages in the frontend components
rg -l "error.*message" src/app/components/
Length of output: 104
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the correct path for components and error handling
fd -t d "components"
# Then search for error-related patterns across the codebase
rg -i "error.*message|error.*response|error.*text"
# Look for error handling patterns in the route file
rg -A 5 "catch|error" "src/app/api/summarize/route.ts"
Length of output: 1997
31-39: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Enhance error handling with specific error cases
The current error handling could be more specific to help users understand and resolve issues.
catch (error: any) {
- const errorMessage = new GoogleGenerativeAIError(error.message);
- console.error('Error in API:', errorMessage.message);
+ console.error('Error in API:', error);
+
+ if (error instanceof GoogleGenerativeAIError) {
+ // Handle specific Gemini API errors
+ return NextResponse.json({
+ error: 'The AI service is temporarily unavailable. Please try again later.',
+ success: false
+ }, { status: 503 });
+ }
+
return NextResponse.json(
{
error: 'Internal Server Error. Please try again after some time.',
success: false
},
- { status: error.response?.status || 500 }
+ { status: 500 }
);
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/components/ChatSuggestions.tsx (2)
1-8: LGTM! Well-structured TypeScript interface
The interface is well-defined with clear prop types and the imports are clean and necessary.
9-9: LGTM! Proper component typing
The component declaration follows React and TypeScript best practices.
tailwind.config.ts (1)
57-64: LGTM! Well-structured shimmer keyframe animation.
The keyframe animation is properly defined with clear start and end states, creating a smooth horizontal sliding effect that's commonly used for loading states or visual feedback.
src/components/BlogChatInterface.tsx (3)
Line range hint 3-17: LGTM: Clean imports and well-typed interface updates
The new imports and interface changes are well-structured and properly typed.
129-140: LGTM: Well-implemented loading state
The loading state implementation provides clear visual feedback with appropriate animations and styling.
54-67:
Critical: Improve error handling security and type safety
The current error handling implementation has several issues:
- Using
anytype reduces type safety - Displaying raw error messages from the API could expose sensitive information
- Missing proper error categorization and user-friendly messages
Apply this diff to improve the implementation:
+ type ApiError = {
+ error: string;
+ };
+
+ const getErrorMessage = (error: unknown): string => {
+ if (typeof error === 'string') return error;
+ if (error instanceof Error) return error.message;
+ return 'An unexpected error occurred';
+ };
+
if (!response.ok) {
- const data = await response.json();
- setMessages(prev => [...prev, { role: 'assistant', content: "Error: " + data.error }]);
+ const data = await response.json() as ApiError;
+ const userMessage = 'I apologize, but I encountered an issue. Please try again later.';
+ console.error('API Error:', data.error);
+ setMessages(prev => [...prev, { role: 'assistant', content: userMessage }]);
return;
}
- } catch (error: any) {
+ } catch (error: unknown) {
console.error('Error in chat:', error);
- setMessages(prev => [...prev, { role: 'assistant', content: "I have encountered some error. Please try again." }]);
+ const userMessage = 'I apologize, but something went wrong. Please try again later.';
+ setMessages(prev => [...prev, { role: 'assistant', content: userMessage }]);
}src/components/ui/toast.tsx (2)
65-66:
Correct 'group-[.destructive]' syntax in Tailwind CSS classes
The syntax 'group-[.destructive]' is invalid in Tailwind CSS. To style elements based on the variant prop, consider using conditional class names or data attributes.
Apply this diff to fix the class names:
"inline-flex h-8 shrink-0 items-center justify-center rounded-md border bg-transparent px-3 text-sm font-medium transition-colors hover:bg-secondary focus:outline-none focus:ring-1 focus:ring-ring disabled:pointer-events-none disabled:opacity-50",
- "group-[.destructive]:border-muted/40 group-[.destructive]:hover:border-destructive/30 group-[.destructive]:hover:bg-destructive group-[.destructive]:hover:text-destructive-foreground group-[.destructive]:focus:ring-destructive",
+ variant === "destructive" &&
+ "border-muted/40 hover:border-destructive/30 hover:bg-destructive hover:text-destructive-foreground focus:ring-destructive",Update the component to handle conditional class names based on the variant prop.
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
80-81:
Fix invalid 'group-[.destructive]' usage in class names
The use of 'group-[.destructive]' in class names is incorrect. Tailwind CSS does not support this syntax for targeting parent variants.
Apply this diff to correct the class names:
"absolute right-1 top-1 rounded-md p-1 text-foreground/50 opacity-0 transition-opacity hover:text-foreground focus:opacity-100 focus:outline-none focus:ring-1 group-hover:opacity-100",
- "group-[.destructive]:text-red-300 group-[.destructive]:hover:text-red-50 group-[.destructive]:focus:ring-red-400 group-[.destructive]:focus:ring-offset-red-600",
+ variant === "destructive" &&
+ "text-red-300 hover:text-red-50 focus:ring-red-400 focus:ring-offset-red-600",Ensure that the variant prop is passed to the component and used for conditional styling.
Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| return ( | ||
| <ToastProvider> | ||
| {toasts.map(function ({ id, title, description, action, ...props }) { | ||
| return ( | ||
| <Toast key={id} {...props}> | ||
| <div className="grid gap-1"> | ||
| {title && <ToastTitle>{title}</ToastTitle>} | ||
| {description && ( | ||
| <ToastDescription>{description}</ToastDescription> | ||
| )} | ||
| </div> | ||
| {action} | ||
| <ToastClose /> | ||
| </Toast> | ||
| ) | ||
| })} | ||
| <ToastViewport /> | ||
| </ToastProvider> | ||
| ) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Add error boundary for improved error handling.
Since this component is critical for displaying error messages, consider wrapping it with an error boundary to gracefully handle rendering failures.
+import { ErrorBoundary } from "@/components/ErrorBoundary";
+
export function Toaster() {
const { toasts } = useToast()
return (
+ <ErrorBoundary fallback={<div>Toast system unavailable</div>}>
<ToastProvider>
{/* ... existing code ... */}
</ToastProvider>
+ </ErrorBoundary>
)
}Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
|
|
||
| export async function POST(request: Request) { | ||
|
|
||
| const { content, query } = await request.json(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add input validation for request body
The content and query are destructured without validation. Missing or invalid input could cause unexpected behavior.
-const { content, query } = await request.json();
+const body = await request.json();
+
+if (!body.content || typeof body.content !== 'string' || !body.query || typeof body.query !== 'string') {
+ return NextResponse.json(
+ { error: 'Invalid request: content and query are required and must be strings', success: false },
+ { status: 400 }
+ );
+}
+
+const { content, query } = body;📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const { content, query } = await request.json(); | |
| const body = await request.json(); | |
| if (!body.content || typeof body.content !== 'string' || !body.query || typeof body.query !== 'string') { | |
| return NextResponse.json( | |
| { error: 'Invalid request: content and query are required and must be strings', success: false }, | |
| { status: 400 } | |
| ); | |
| } | |
| const { content, query } = body; |
| import { NextResponse } from "next/server"; | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| const GEMINI_API_KEY = process.env.GEMINI_API_KEY; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Add validation for GEMINI_API_KEY
The API key is used without validation. If the environment variable is missing, this could lead to runtime errors.
-const GEMINI_API_KEY = process.env.GEMINI_API_KEY;
+const GEMINI_API_KEY = process.env.GEMINI_API_KEY;
+if (!GEMINI_API_KEY) {
+ throw new Error('GEMINI_API_KEY environment variable is not set');
+}📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const GEMINI_API_KEY = process.env.GEMINI_API_KEY; | |
| const GEMINI_API_KEY = process.env.GEMINI_API_KEY; | |
| if (!GEMINI_API_KEY) { | |
| throw new Error('GEMINI_API_KEY environment variable is not set'); | |
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Rahulsoni9321 pls check all the suggestions raised by @coderabbitai
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Rahulsoni9321 pls check all the suggestions raised by @coderabbitai
@tyaga001 made all the suggested changes by @coderabbitai and open a new pr (#49), Please have a look and let me know if changes needed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@Rahulsoni9321, thank you for addressing the suggestions and opening PR #49. Let me know if you need any further assistance.
| <motion.div onClick={() => { handleSend(`Make me understand this blog : ${title}?`) }} initial={{ y: 20, opacity: 0 }} whileHover={{ scale: 1.05 }} animate={{ y: 0, opacity: 1 }} transition={{ duration: 0.1 }} exit={{ y: 20, opacity: 0 }} className='px-4 py-5 border border-white/40 rounded-[14px] bg-black/70 text-sm font-[200] text-white/60 w-full hover:bg-black hover:text-white/80 cursor-pointer'> | ||
| Make me understand this blog : {title}? | ||
| </motion.div> | ||
| <motion.div onClick={() => { handleSend(`What does "${description}" means in this blog? `) }} initial={{ y: 20, opacity: 0 }} whileHover={{ scale: 1.05 }} animate={{ y: 0, opacity: 1 }} transition={{ duration: 0.1 }} exit={{ y: 20, opacity: 0 }} className='px-4 py-5 border border-white/40 rounded-[14px] bg-black/70 text-sm font-[200] text-white/60 w-full hover:bg-black hover:text-white/80 cursor-pointer'> | ||
| What does "{description}" means in this blog? | ||
| </motion.div> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Consider sanitizing user-provided content
The title and description are directly interpolated into the template strings. Consider sanitizing this content to prevent potential XSS attacks.
Would you like me to provide an example implementation using a sanitization library like DOMPurify?
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 23-23: " can be escaped with ", “, ", ”.
(react/no-unescaped-entities)
[error] 23-23: " can be escaped with ", “, ", ”.
(react/no-unescaped-entities)
| <motion.div onClick={() => { handleSend(`What does "${description}" means in this blog? `) }} initial={{ y: 20, opacity: 0 }} whileHover={{ scale: 1.05 }} animate={{ y: 0, opacity: 1 }} transition={{ duration: 0.1 }} exit={{ y: 20, opacity: 0 }} className='px-4 py-5 border border-white/40 rounded-[14px] bg-black/70 text-sm font-[200] text-white/60 w-full hover:bg-black hover:text-white/80 cursor-pointer'> | ||
| What does "{description}" means in this blog? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix grammar and escape quotes
- The grammar in the question should be "mean" instead of "means"
- The quotes should be escaped as per eslint
- What does "{description}" means in this blog?
+ What does "{description}" mean in this blog?📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| <motion.div onClick={() => { handleSend(`What does "${description}" means in this blog? `) }} initial={{ y: 20, opacity: 0 }} whileHover={{ scale: 1.05 }} animate={{ y: 0, opacity: 1 }} transition={{ duration: 0.1 }} exit={{ y: 20, opacity: 0 }} className='px-4 py-5 border border-white/40 rounded-[14px] bg-black/70 text-sm font-[200] text-white/60 w-full hover:bg-black hover:text-white/80 cursor-pointer'> | |
| What does "{description}" means in this blog? | |
| <motion.div onClick={() => { handleSend(`What does "${description}" means in this blog? `) }} initial={{ y: 20, opacity: 0 }} whileHover={{ scale: 1.05 }} animate={{ y: 0, opacity: 1 }} transition={{ duration: 0.1 }} exit={{ y: 20, opacity: 0 }} className='px-4 py-5 border border-white/40 rounded-[14px] bg-black/70 text-sm font-[200] text-white/60 w-full hover:bg-black hover:text-white/80 cursor-pointer'> | |
| What does "{description}" mean in this blog? |
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint
[error] 23-23: " can be escaped with ", “, ", ”.
(react/no-unescaped-entities)
[error] 23-23: " can be escaped with ", “, ", ”.
(react/no-unescaped-entities)
| const TOAST_LIMIT = 1 | ||
| const TOAST_REMOVE_DELAY = 1000000 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider adjusting toast limits and timing
The current configuration might need adjustment:
TOAST_LIMIT = 1is very restrictive, consider increasing it to allow multiple notifications (e.g., 3-5)TOAST_REMOVE_DELAY = 1000000(16.67 minutes) seems excessive for a toast notification. Consider reducing it to a more standard duration (e.g., 5000ms)
-const TOAST_LIMIT = 1
-const TOAST_REMOVE_DELAY = 1000000
+const TOAST_LIMIT = 3
+const TOAST_REMOVE_DELAY = 5000📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const TOAST_LIMIT = 1 | |
| const TOAST_REMOVE_DELAY = 1000000 | |
| const TOAST_LIMIT = 3 | |
| const TOAST_REMOVE_DELAY = 5000 |
| React.useEffect(() => { | ||
| listeners.push(setState) | ||
| return () => { | ||
| const index = listeners.indexOf(setState) | ||
| if (index > -1) { | ||
| listeners.splice(index, 1) | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| }, [state]) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix useEffect dependency
The useEffect hook depends on the state variable, which could cause unnecessary re-renders or potential infinite loops. The cleanup function should be independent of the state.
React.useEffect(() => {
listeners.push(setState)
return () => {
const index = listeners.indexOf(setState)
if (index > -1) {
listeners.splice(index, 1)
}
}
-}, [state])
+}, [])📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| React.useEffect(() => { | |
| listeners.push(setState) | |
| return () => { | |
| const index = listeners.indexOf(setState) | |
| if (index > -1) { | |
| listeners.splice(index, 1) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }, [state]) | |
| React.useEffect(() => { | |
| listeners.push(setState) | |
| return () => { | |
| const index = listeners.indexOf(setState) | |
| if (index > -1) { | |
| listeners.splice(index, 1) | |
| } | |
| } | |
| }, []) |
| case "DISMISS_TOAST": { | ||
| const { toastId } = action | ||
|
|
||
| // ! Side effects ! - This could be extracted into a dismissToast() action, | ||
| // but I'll keep it here for simplicity | ||
| if (toastId) { | ||
| addToRemoveQueue(toastId) | ||
| } else { | ||
| state.toasts.forEach((toast) => { | ||
| addToRemoveQueue(toast.id) | ||
| }) | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| return { | ||
| ...state, | ||
| toasts: state.toasts.map((t) => | ||
| t.id === toastId || toastId === undefined | ||
| ? { | ||
| ...t, | ||
| open: false, | ||
| } | ||
| : t | ||
| ), | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Remove side effects from reducer
The reducer contains side effects in the DISMISS_TOAST case, which violates the principle of reducers being pure functions. Consider moving the timeout management logic outside the reducer.
case "DISMISS_TOAST": {
const { toastId } = action
-
- // ! Side effects ! - This could be extracted into a dismissToast() action,
- // but I'll keep it here for simplicity
- if (toastId) {
- addToRemoveQueue(toastId)
- } else {
- state.toasts.forEach((toast) => {
- addToRemoveQueue(toast.id)
- })
- }
return {
...state,
toasts: state.toasts.map((t) =>
t.id === toastId || toastId === undefined
? {
...t,
open: false,
}
: t
),
}
}Move the queue management to the dispatch function or create a separate action.
Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
src/components/BlogChatInterface.tsx
Outdated
| const parseContent = (content: string) => { | ||
| const formattedContent = content.replace(/\*\*(.*?)\*\*/g, '<b>$1</b>'); | ||
|
|
||
|
|
||
| const paragraphWrapped = formattedContent | ||
| .split('\n\n') | ||
| .map((line) => `<p>${line.trim()}</p>`) | ||
| .join(''); | ||
|
|
||
| return paragraphWrapped; | ||
| }; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: XSS vulnerability in content parsing
The current implementation uses dangerouslySetInnerHTML without proper sanitization, which could lead to XSS attacks. The parseContent function needs to be enhanced with proper HTML sanitization.
Consider using DOMPurify or a similar library to sanitize the HTML:
+ import DOMPurify from 'dompurify';
const parseContent = (content: string) => {
const formattedContent = content.replace(/\*\*(.*?)\*\*/g, '<b>$1</b>');
const paragraphWrapped = formattedContent
.split('\n\n')
.map((line) => `<p>${line.trim()}</p>`)
.join('');
- return paragraphWrapped;
+ return DOMPurify.sanitize(paragraphWrapped);
};Also update your package.json:
+ "dependencies": {
+ "dompurify": "^3.0.6",
+ "@types/dompurify": "^3.0.5"
+ }Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.
| default: "border bg-background text-foreground", | ||
| destructive: | ||
| "destructive group border-destructive bg-destructive text-destructive-foreground", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Remove invalid 'destructive' class from variant definitions
The 'destructive' class in line 34 is unnecessary and may cause unintended styling issues. It should be removed from the variant definitions.
Apply this diff to fix the issue:
default: "border bg-background text-foreground",
destructive:
- "destructive group border-destructive bg-destructive text-destructive-foreground",
+ "group border-destructive bg-destructive text-destructive-foreground",📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| default: "border bg-background text-foreground", | |
| destructive: | |
| "destructive group border-destructive bg-destructive text-destructive-foreground", | |
| default: "border bg-background text-foreground", | |
| destructive: | |
| "group border-destructive bg-destructive text-destructive-foreground", |
Hey @tyaga001, Made a new commit with the following changes: Set up the Gemini API and revamped the UI of the chat interface. The agent now answers only blog-related queries. Let me know your thoughts! |
|
Rahulsoni9321
changed the title
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/app/api/summarize/route.ts (3)
12-12: Remove redundant type assertionThe type assertion (
!) is unnecessary since the previous if-block ensures GEMINI_API_KEY is defined.-const genAI = new GoogleGenerativeAI(GEMINI_API_KEY!); +const genAI = new GoogleGenerativeAI(GEMINI_API_KEY);
13-16: Extract system instruction to a constant and consider configuration managementThe system instruction is quite long and the model configuration is hardcoded. Consider:
- Moving the system instruction to a separate constant
- Making the model name configurable via environment variables
+const SYSTEM_INSTRUCTION = `You're an AI assistant, Who only answers questions related to the blog post that have provided to you in the prompt. + +Try to Answer using numeric points for readability and Bold the title of the point. + +If the user wants help related to the topic mentioned in the blog you can answer that. + +If the question is not related to the blog post or the topic that is mentioned on the blog, Throw error response.`; + +const MODEL_NAME = process.env.GEMINI_MODEL_NAME || "gemini-1.5-flash"; + const model = genAI.getGenerativeModel({ - model: "gemini-1.5-flash", - systemInstruction: "You're an AI assistant, Who only answers questions related to the blog post that have provided to you in the prompt.\n\nTry to Answer using numeric points for readability and Bold the title of the point. \n\n If the user wants help related to the topic mentioned in the blog you can answer that.\n\n If the question is not related to the blog post or the topic that is mentioned on the blog, Throw error response." + model: MODEL_NAME, + systemInstruction: SYSTEM_INSTRUCTION },
25-25: Improve prompt construction robustnessThe current prompt construction assumes the content and query are properly formatted strings. Consider sanitizing inputs and adding structure.
- const prompt = `Here's a blog post:\n\n${content}\n\nQuestion: ${query}`; + const sanitizedContent = content.trim(); + const sanitizedQuery = query.trim(); + const prompt = [ + 'Here\'s a blog post:', + '', + sanitizedContent, + '', + 'Question:', + sanitizedQuery + ].join('\n');
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/app/api/summarize/route.ts(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/app/api/summarize/route.ts (2)
22-22: Add input validation for request body
The content and query are destructured without validation.
9-11: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error message for missing API key
The current error message is too generic. It should specifically indicate that the GEMINI_API_KEY is missing.
- throw new Error("Something went wrong while fetching API Keys.")
+ throw new Error("GEMINI_API_KEY environment variable is not set")Likely invalid or redundant comment.
src/app/api/summarize/route.ts
Outdated
| const errorMessage = new GoogleGenerativeAIError(error.message); | ||
| console.error('Error in API:', errorMessage.message); | ||
| return NextResponse.json( | ||
| { error: 'Error processing request. Please try again.' }, | ||
| { | ||
| error: 'Internal Server Error. Please try again after some time.', | ||
| success: false | ||
|
|
||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve error handling and logging
The current error handling could be more specific and the error logging exposes raw error messages.
- const errorMessage = new GoogleGenerativeAIError(error.message);
- console.error('Error in API:', errorMessage.message);
+ const isGoogleAIError = error instanceof GoogleGenerativeAIError;
+
+ // Log structured error information
+ console.error('API Error:', {
+ type: isGoogleAIError ? 'GoogleGenerativeAI' : 'Unknown',
+ message: error.message,
+ timestamp: new Date().toISOString()
+ });
+
+ const clientMessage = isGoogleAIError
+ ? 'The AI service is temporarily unavailable. Please try again later.'
+ : 'Internal Server Error. Please try again after some time.';
+
return NextResponse.json(
{
- error: 'Internal Server Error. Please try again after some time.',
+ error: clientMessage,
success: false
},
- { status: error.response?.status || 500 }
+ { status: isGoogleAIError ? 503 : 500 }
);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| const errorMessage = new GoogleGenerativeAIError(error.message); | |
| console.error('Error in API:', errorMessage.message); | |
| return NextResponse.json( | |
| { error: 'Error processing request. Please try again.' }, | |
| { | |
| error: 'Internal Server Error. Please try again after some time.', | |
| success: false | |
| }, | |
| const isGoogleAIError = error instanceof GoogleGenerativeAIError; | |
| // Log structured error information | |
| console.error('API Error:', { | |
| type: isGoogleAIError ? 'GoogleGenerativeAI' : 'Unknown', | |
| message: error.message, | |
| timestamp: new Date().toISOString() | |
| }); | |
| const clientMessage = isGoogleAIError | |
| ? 'The AI service is temporarily unavailable. Please try again later.' | |
| : 'Internal Server Error. Please try again after some time.'; | |
| return NextResponse.json( | |
| { | |
| error: clientMessage, | |
| success: false | |
| }, | |
| { status: isGoogleAIError ? 503 : 500 } | |
| ); |
| return NextResponse.json({ | ||
| answer: result.response.text(), | ||
| success: true | ||
| }) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Success field is inconsistently used across API endpoints
The success field is only used in the summarize API endpoint but not in other API endpoints (comments, views). This inconsistency could lead to confusion in frontend error handling. Other endpoints simply return the data or an error object with appropriate HTTP status codes, which is a more standard REST API pattern.
src/app/api/summarize/route.ts: Usessuccess: true/falsesrc/app/api/comments/route.ts: Returns data directly or error with status codesrc/app/api/views/[slug]/route.ts: Returns data directly or error with status code
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify success response structure
The response structure includes a success field as mentioned in the PR objectives. However, let's verify this is consistently used across the frontend.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of the success field in frontend components
rg -l "success.*true|success.*false" --type ts --type tsx
Length of output: 87
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for usage of the success field in frontend components and API responses
# Using ripgrep without file type restrictions since .tsx extension wasn't recognized
rg -l "success.*true|success.*false"
Length of output: 69
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for API response handling in components
rg -A 5 "NextResponse.json"
Length of output: 3037
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Look for other API route handlers to check response consistency
fd "route.ts" --exec cat {}
Length of output: 3656
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/components/BlogChatInterface.tsx (2)
35-40: Enhance error handling for empty inputsThe toast notification for empty input is good, but consider adding input validation for whitespace-only strings.
-if (!promptToSend.trim()) { +const trimmedPrompt = promptToSend.trim(); +if (!trimmedPrompt) { toast({ description: "Please Enter valid input." }) return; }; +if (trimmedPrompt.length < 3) { + toast({ description: "Please enter a longer question." }) + return; +}
171-183: Enhance content parsing functionThe content parsing function could be improved:
- Add JSDoc documentation
- Handle edge cases
- Consider using constants for regex patterns
+const BOLD_PATTERN = /\*\*(.*?)\*\*/g; + +/** + * Parses and sanitizes content by converting markdown-like syntax to HTML + * @param content - The raw content string to parse + * @returns Sanitized HTML string + */ const parseContent = (content: string) => { - const formattedContent = content.replace(/\*\*(.*?)\*\*/g, '<b>$1</b>'); + if (!content) return ''; + + const formattedContent = content.replace(BOLD_PATTERN, '<b>$1</b>'); const paragraphWrapped = formattedContent .split('\n\n') - .map((line) => `<p>${line.trim()}</p>`) + .filter(line => line.trim()) + .map(line => `<p>${line.trim()}</p>`) .join(''); return DOMPurify.sanitize(paragraphWrapped); };
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
package.json(3 hunks)src/app/api/summarize/route.ts(1 hunks)src/components/BlogChatInterface.tsx(4 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/app/api/summarize/route.ts
🔇 Additional comments (5)
package.json (2)
27-27: Consider consolidating toast libraries
The PR adds both @radix-ui/react-toast and sonner for toast notifications. Using multiple toast libraries increases bundle size unnecessarily.
Also applies to: 53-53
56-56: Version pin the shadcn/ui dependency
Using a direct GitHub repository reference without version pinning can lead to reproducibility issues.
src/components/BlogChatInterface.tsx (3)
16-18: LGTM: Props interface update
The addition of blogTitle and blogDescription props improves component reusability and provides better context for chat suggestions.
85-88: LGTM: Improved UI with better accessibility
The UI improvements with backdrop blur and proper contrast ratios enhance accessibility and user experience.
Also applies to: 92-93
56-69:
Improve error handling and typing
The error handling can be improved in several ways:
- Use
unknowninstead ofanyfor better type safety - Provide more specific error messages
- Add error logging
-if (!response.ok) {
+interface ErrorResponse {
+ error: string;
+}
+
+if (!response.ok) {
const data = await response.json();
- setMessages(prev => [...prev, { role: 'assistant', content: "Error: " + data.error }]);
+ const errorResponse = data as ErrorResponse;
+ setMessages(prev => [...prev, {
+ role: 'assistant',
+ content: `I apologize, but I encountered an error: ${errorResponse.error}. Please try again.`
+ }]);
return;
}
-} catch (error: any) {
+} catch (error: unknown) {
console.error('Error in chat:', error);
- setMessages(prev => [...prev, { role: 'assistant', content: "I have encountered some error. Please try again." }]);
+ const errorMessage = error instanceof Error ? error.message : 'An unexpected error occurred';
+ setMessages(prev => [...prev, {
+ role: 'assistant',
+ content: `I apologize, but ${errorMessage}. Please try again.`
+ }]);
}Likely invalid or redundant comment.
| @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ | |||
| }, | |||
| "dependencies": { | |||
| "@clerk/nextjs": "^5.2.4", | |||
| "@google/generative-ai": "^0.21.0", | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Security vulnerabilities detected in DOMPurify dependency
Critical and high severity vulnerabilities have been found in DOMPurify. The current version 3.2.2 is affected by:
- CRITICAL: Prototype pollution vulnerability (affects < 2.4.2)
- HIGH: Nesting-based mXSS vulnerability (affects >= 3.0.0, < 3.1.3)
- HIGH: Prototype pollution vulnerability (affects >= 3.0.0, < 3.1.3)
Action required:
- Upgrade DOMPurify to version >= 3.1.3 to address these security issues
- Update @types/dompurify to match the new DOMPurify version
Other dependencies (@google/generative-ai and html-react-parser) are at their latest versions and have no known vulnerabilities.
🔗 Analysis chain
Verify compatibility of new dependencies
Please ensure the versions of new dependencies are compatible:
@google/[email protected]@types/[email protected][email protected][email protected]
Also applies to: 28-28, 35-35, 40-40
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for compatibility issues and security advisories
# Check for known vulnerabilities in new dependencies
gh api graphql -f query='
{
securityVulnerabilities(first: 5, ecosystem: NPM, package: "dompurify") {
nodes {
advisory {
summary
severity
publishedAt
}
vulnerableVersionRange
}
}
}'
# Check latest versions
for pkg in "@google/generative-ai" "@types/dompurify" "dompurify" "html-react-parser"; do
echo "Checking $pkg..."
npm view $pkg version
done
Length of output: 1907
Made Changes in the response that have been sent out by the server when It is receiving error from the Claude API. And made some changes on how error is handled on the frontend.
Before
After
I noticed that the chatbot in the repository is currently returning an error. Upon further investigation, it seems that the issue might be related to the API keys for Claude AI not being set up correctly. This could be why the chatbot isn't functioning as expected.
To resolve this, you may need to:
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
GEMINI_API_KEYfor configuration.ChatSuggestionscomponent to engage users with AI about blog content.Bug Fixes
Style