-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 227
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix the problem that ttlManager may stop working if no need to lock after retry aggressive locking #1522
Fix the problem that ttlManager may stop working if no need to lock after retry aggressive locking #1522
Conversation
…fter retry aggressive locking Signed-off-by: MyonKeminta <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: MyonKeminta <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: MyonKeminta <[email protected]>
txnkv/transaction/txn.go
Outdated
// acquirePessimisticLock requests, it will call ttlManager.run() again, but it's reentrant and will do nothing | ||
// as the ttlManager is already running. | ||
// * If the primary key is changed, the ttlManager will need to run on the new primary key instead. Reset it. | ||
if !noNewLockToAcquire && !bytes.Equal(txn.aggressiveLockingContext.primaryKey, txn.aggressiveLockingContext.lastPrimaryKey) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Maybe replacing !noNewLockToAcquire
with hasNewLockToAcquire
is more idiomatic and makes the code more readable
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
emmmm, ok
Signed-off-by: MyonKeminta <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: cfzjywxk, ekexium The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Ref: pingcap/tidb#58279