fix: chainspec irregularities

[orriin]

Closes #489

• Sets SS58 format in Rust chain spec definitions to match chain spec JSON
• Sets missing protocol_id in Rust chain spec definitions
• Rebuilds plain_spec_finney.json, plain_spec_testfinney.json, raw_spec_finney.json, raw_spec_testfinney.json
• Removes finney_plain_spec.json, raw_spec.json, raw_testspec.json since they appeared stale and I do not understand their purpose
• Adds CI that builds and commits updated chain specs on push to branches development, staging, main

TODO

• Check if we need bootnodes
• Create script to easily update chainspecs
• Add CI to enforce JSON chain spec stays consistent with the Rust definitions

[prop-opentensor]

bootnodes:

finney: /dns/bootnode.finney.chain.opentensor.ai/tcp/30333/ws/p2p/12D3KooWRwbMb85RWnT8DSXSYMWQtuDwh4LJzndoRrTDotTR5gDC
testnet:
/dns/bootnode.test.chain.opentensor.ai/tcp/30333/p2p/12D3KooWPM4mLcKJGtyVtkggqdG84zWrd7Rij6PGQDoijh1X86Vr

fyi: raw_testspec.json is currently in use on devnet validators - since we plan to replace devnet with the testnet mirror, imo this can still be removed

[orriin]

fyi: raw_testspec.json is currently in use on devnet validators - since we plan to replace devnet with the testnet mirror, imo this can still be removed

Cool, yeah I'm removing all of finney_plain_spec.json, raw_spec.json, raw_testspec.json, they seem to just be duplicates.

[birkskyum]

related - i just noticed that the mainnet spec files was also used for people wanting to start at testnet docker container, but it might be obsoleted if those spec files are now deleted

• hotfix(docker): Use raw_testspec for test nodes #329

Also, these raw_spec.json is mentioned in docs all over the place, which would be good to have synced with this change

[birkskyum]

out of curiosity, what is the difference between raw_spec and plain_spec?

[orriin]

out of curiosity, what is the difference between raw_spec and plain_spec?

See the 'Raw chain specifications' section at these docs https://docs.substrate.io/build/chain-spec/

[rajkaramchedu]

We don't use the word "finney" in the published docs. We use "mainnet" or "testnet" or "devnet" or "local". Given this, for clarifying what's what in my docs, are the below two statements accurate?

• The raw_spec_finney.json spec is for mainnet.
• The raw_spec_testfinney.json spec is for testnet.

Thanks

[orriin]

We don't use the word "finney" in the published docs. We use "mainnet" or "testnet" or "devnet" or "local". Given this, for clarifying what's what in my docs, are the below two statements accurate?

• The raw_spec_finney.json spec is for mainnet.
• The raw_spec_testfinney.json spec is for testnet.

Thanks

This is correct :)