Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

8344969: Remove the jmx.mxbean.multiname compatibility property #23131

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kevinjwalls
Copy link
Contributor

@kevinjwalls kevinjwalls commented Jan 15, 2025

Remove the System Property "jmx.mxbean.multiname" which was introduced in JDK-7 for compatibility with code which may have depended on previous incorrect behaviour. Removal is long overdue.


Progress

  • Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
  • Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
  • Commit message must refer to an issue
  • Change requires CSR request JDK-8347805 to be approved

Issues

  • JDK-8344969: Remove the jmx.mxbean.multiname compatibility property (Enhancement - P4)
  • JDK-8347805: Remove the jmx.mxbean.multiname compatibility property (CSR)

Reviewers

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23131/head:pull/23131
$ git checkout pull/23131

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/23131
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/23131/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 23131

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 23131

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/23131.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

@bridgekeeper
Copy link

bridgekeeper bot commented Jan 15, 2025

👋 Welcome back kevinw! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 15, 2025

❗ This change is not yet ready to be integrated.
See the Progress checklist in the description for automated requirements.

@openjdk openjdk bot added the csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration label Jan 15, 2025
@openjdk
Copy link

openjdk bot commented Jan 15, 2025

@kevinjwalls The following labels will be automatically applied to this pull request:

  • jmx
  • serviceability

When this pull request is ready to be reviewed, an "RFR" email will be sent to the corresponding mailing lists. If you would like to change these labels, use the /label pull request command.

@kevinjwalls kevinjwalls marked this pull request as ready for review January 15, 2025 11:08
@openjdk openjdk bot added the rfr Pull request is ready for review label Jan 15, 2025
@mlbridge
Copy link

mlbridge bot commented Jan 15, 2025

Webrevs

Copy link
Contributor

@sspitsyn sspitsyn left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

@@ -41,8 +40,7 @@
public class SameObjectTwoNamesTest {

public static void main(String[] args) throws Exception {
boolean expectException =
(System.getProperty("jmx.mxbean.multiname") == null);
boolean expectException = true;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it would be better to drop this variable at all (and remove unreachable code when the variable is "false")

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes sure, can remove that and simplify this small test - done.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
csr Pull request needs approved CSR before integration jmx [email protected] rfr Pull request is ready for review serviceability [email protected]
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants