Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

DM-43943: Update DMTN-222 #3

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025
Merged

DM-43943: Update DMTN-222 #3

merged 4 commits into from
Jan 16, 2025

Conversation

czwa
Copy link
Contributor

@czwa czwa commented Nov 8, 2024

This version contains my latest "best practices" and command examples.

@czwa czwa force-pushed the tickets/DM-43943 branch 4 times, most recently from b1005ff to d39d4a9 Compare November 8, 2024 23:44
@Alex-Broughton
Copy link

Hi Chris, I've attached a PDF with notes on this technote. Feel free to respond to the comments in any way that is easiest for you.

dmtn-222_reviewed.pdf

Copy link

@aferte aferte left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Very nice and useful. A few notes:

  • yes figure 1 is useful but could you explicitly add TAXICAB in the flowchart? Also I am not sure the 'proposed calibration' to 'Certify for use' arrow makes sense, because we always want to go through cp_verify.
  • Could you add an example of a CALIBRATION collection at the end of page 3 to show the CHAINED and RUN collections.
  • The JIRA tickets for calib construction might have a lot of attachments, it might be useful to enforce a name (e.g. construction.sh and verification.sh) for the files that document the process that was used so it is easier to find.
  • Typos:
    • top of page 6: calibraion -> calibration
    • one before last paragraph on page 6: 'can be used to As [...]' => 'can be used. As [...]'
  • I would be happy to help work on section 6 at some point as I would like to exercise the full process at some point anyway

@czwa czwa merged commit 66e4eba into main Jan 16, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants