-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Delete SECURITY.md #293
Delete SECURITY.md #293
Conversation
Reviewer's Guide by SourceryThis pull request deletes the SECURITY.md file. No diagrams generated as the changes look simple and do not need a visual representation. File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
I was unable to write a description for this pull request. This could be because I only found files I can't scan. |
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe Changes
Poem
π Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI π Files selected for processing (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? πͺ§ TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've completed my review and didn't find any issues.
Need a new review? Comment
/korbit-review
on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization
Interacting with Korbit
- You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the
/korbit-review
command in a comment at the root of your PR.- You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the
/korbit-generate-pr-description
command in any comment on your PR.- Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the
/korbit-resolve
command in any comment on your PR.- Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
- Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a π or π on the comments Korbit posts.
Customizing Korbit
- Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
- Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.
Current Korbit Configuration
General Settings
β
Setting Value Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts Max Issue Count 10 Automatic PR Descriptions β Issue Categories
β
Category Enabled Naming β Database Operations β Documentation β Logging β Error Handling β Systems and Environment β Objects and Data Structures β Readability and Maintainability β Asynchronous Processing β Design Patterns β Third-Party Libraries β Performance β Security β Functionality β Feedback and Support
Note
Korbit Pro is free for open source projects π
Looking to add Korbit to your team? Get started with a free 2 week trial here
Here's the code health analysis summary for commits Analysis Summary
Code Coverage Report
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hey @guibranco - I've reviewed your changes - here's some feedback:
Overall Comments:
- Please provide justification for removing SECURITY.md. Security documentation is important for the project - if this file needs to be removed or replaced, explain the reasoning and any alternative documentation that will take its place.
Here's what I looked at during the review
- π’ General issues: all looks good
- π’ Security: all looks good
- π’ Testing: all looks good
- π’ Complexity: all looks good
- π’ Documentation: all looks good
Help me be more useful! Please click π or π on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
Infisical secrets check: β No secrets leaked! π» Scan logs12:58AM INF scanning for exposed secrets...
12:58AM INF 245 commits scanned.
12:58AM INF scan completed in 460ms
12:58AM INF no leaks found
|
Coverage summary from CodacySee diff coverage on Codacy
Coverage variation details
Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: Diff coverage details
Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: See your quality gate settingsΒ Β Β Β Change summary preferencesCodacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more Footnotes
|
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
Closes #
π Description
β Checks
β’οΈ Does this introduce a breaking change?
βΉ Additional Information
Summary by CodeRabbit
SECURITY.md
file, which previously outlined the security policy and reporting instructions for vulnerabilities.