-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
Transparency Score Logic
Please note that these scores are subjective in nature.
Score multiplier for calculating final points: 10
NOTE: This score multiplier is arbitrary - the idea is simply to have a round number which looks good from a user PoV.
- Cost to validator or council member: 1
- Value for nominator or voter: 1
Base Total Score: 2
or 4
Final points: 20
- Cost to validator or council member: 5
- Value for nominator or voter: 5
Base Total Score: 10
or 20
Final points: 100
- Cost to validator or council member: 2
- Value for nominator or voter: 3
Base Total Score: 5
Final points: 50
- Cost to validator or council member: 4
- Value for nominator or voter: 3
Base Total Score: 7
Final points: 70
- Cost to validator or council member: 2
- Value for nominator or voter: 2
Base Total Score: 4
Final points: 40
- Cost to validator or council member: 2
- Value for nominator or voter: 3
Base Total Score: 5
Final points: 50
Net sum of all final points = 20 + 100 + 50 + 70 + 40 + 50 = 330
For completing all 6 attributes as opposed to 5 - i.e. not missing even a single field, the user shall be awarded an extra 70
points to make the score an even 400
- These points will NOT be displayed publicly - only to the user who owns the profile
- These points lead to different possible levels of transparency for which we shall have badges assigned to users
Info about team members and bio becomes somewhat game-able and is less reliable in comparison to on-chain identity. Hence, for the first iteration, they wouldn't be taken into account for determination of transparency score.
- 0 points → No badge
- 0 < 200 points → good transparency badge
- 200 < 330 points → excellent transparency badge
- 400 points → supreme transparency badge