Update for beaver 0.4.0 #51
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request implements several updates across various files in the Elixir project. Key changes include updating the Elixir CI workflow to a stable version, modifying library dependencies, renaming parameters for consistency, and enhancing error handling in several modules. The changes also involve simplifying function signatures and updating test cases to reflect new error handling practices. Overall, the modifications focus on improving clarity, maintainability, and consistency throughout the codebase. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 5
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (7)
lib/charms/diagnostic.ex (1)
4-4: Optimize module aliasingSince you're aliasing
Beaver.MLIRasMLIR, consider using the alias throughout the module for consistency and brevity.Apply this diff to use the alias consistently:
alias Beaver.MLIR def compile_error_message(%Beaver.MLIR.Diagnostic{} = d) do - loc = to_string(MLIR.location(d)) + loc = to_string(MLIR.location(d))lib/charms/jit.ex (3)
10-10: Remove unused fieldownerfrom structThe field
ownerin thedefstructmay not be used elsewhere in the code. If it's unnecessary, consider removing it to simplify the struct.Apply this diff to remove the
ownerfield:defstruct ctx: nil, engine: nil, owner: true +defstruct ctx: nil, engine: nil
Line range hint
59-65: Handle potentialnilmodules inmerge_modules/2functionIn the
merge_modules/2function, an exception is raised when a module isnil. However, ifnilmodules are expected, consider handling them gracefully without raising an exception.Apply this diff to skip
nilmodules:defp merge_modules(modules, opts \\ []) do destroy = opts[:destroy] || true [head | tail] = modules for module <- tail do - if MLIR.null?(module), do: raise("can't merge a null module") + if MLIR.null?(module) do + # Skip nil modules + next + end clone_ops(head, module) if destroy, do: MLIR.Module.destroy(module) end
84-95: Improve error handling indo_init/1The error handling within
MLIR.Context.with_diagnostics/2could be enhanced by capturing and processing diagnostics more effectively. Currently, only a simple error message is returned.Consider logging diagnostics or providing more detailed error information to aid in debugging.
lib/charms/pointer.ex (1)
Line range hint
1-1: Consider documenting API changes in CHANGELOGThe changes appear to be part of a coordinated update to beaver 0.4.0, including:
- Consistent parameter naming (
block→blk)- More idiomatic Elixir function names (
is_null→null?)- Simplified MLIR API calls (
StringRef.to_string→to_string)Consider documenting these API changes in the CHANGELOG to help other developers migrate their code.
lib/charms/intrinsic.ex (1)
6-6: Consider updating struct documentation.The struct's documentation should be updated to reflect the new field name.
defmodule Opts do @moduledoc """ Options for intrinsic functions. + + ## Fields + + - `:ctx` - The context + - `:blk` - The block + - `:loc` - The location """ defstruct [:ctx, :blk, :loc] endlib/charms/defm/definition.ex (1)
271-277: Consider extracting pipeline configuration.The sequence of transformation passes could be extracted into a configuration for better maintainability.
+ @pipeline_steps [ + {"append_missing_return", "func.func", &append_missing_return/1}, + {Charms.Defm.Pass.CreateAbsentFunc, "func.func"}, + {"check-poison", "builtin.module", &check_poison!/1} + ] + defp do_compile(ctx, definitions) do # ... - |> Beaver.Composer.nested( - "func.func", - {"append_missing_return", "func.func", &append_missing_return/1} - ) - |> Beaver.Composer.nested("func.func", Charms.Defm.Pass.CreateAbsentFunc) - |> Beaver.Composer.append({"check-poison", "builtin.module", &check_poison!/1}) + |> apply_pipeline(@pipeline_steps) # ... end + + defp apply_pipeline(ir, steps) do + Enum.reduce(steps, ir, fn + {name, scope, func}, acc when is_function(func) -> + Beaver.Composer.nested(acc, scope, {name, scope, func}) + {module, scope}, acc when is_atom(module) -> + Beaver.Composer.nested(acc, scope, module) + end) + end
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
mix.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
.github/workflows/elixir.yml(1 hunks)guides/programming-with-charms.livemd(1 hunks)lib/charms/debug.ex(1 hunks)lib/charms/defm/definition.ex(5 hunks)lib/charms/defm/expander.ex(20 hunks)lib/charms/defm/pass/create_absent_func.ex(1 hunks)lib/charms/diagnostic.ex(1 hunks)lib/charms/intrinsic.ex(1 hunks)lib/charms/jit.ex(6 hunks)lib/charms/kernel.ex(4 hunks)lib/charms/pointer.ex(1 hunks)lib/charms/prelude.ex(2 hunks)lib/charms/simd.ex(1 hunks)mix.exs(3 hunks)test/call_test.exs(1 hunks)test/expander_test.exs(3 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- guides/programming-with-charms.livemd
🔇 Additional comments (25)
lib/charms/jit.ex (1)
13-27: Verify transformation passes for compatibility
The transformation passes used in jit_of_mod/1 may need verification to ensure they are compatible with the latest version of the MLIR framework. Verify that the pass names and options are correct.
Run the following script to list available transformation passes:
test/call_test.exs (2)
4-4: Ensure consistent log capturing setup
The addition of @tag capture_log: true is appropriate for enabling log capture in tests. Ensure that this change is consistent across all tests that require log capturing.
9-19: Remove unnecessary code and simplify test
The removal of capture_log and log assertions simplifies the test and focuses on the core functionality. This enhances readability and maintainability.
.github/workflows/elixir.yml (2)
27-27: Update Elixir version to stable release
Upgrading elixir-version from "1.17-dev" to "1.17" ensures that the CI uses the stable release of Elixir, which is a best practice for maintaining consistency and reliability in builds.
27-27: Verify OTP version compatibility
Ensure that OTP version "26.0" is compatible with Elixir "1.17". Double-check that this combination is supported and update if necessary.
Run the following script to confirm compatibility:
✅ Verification successful
Elixir 1.17 and OTP 26.0 are compatible versions
Based on the project's mix.exs file, which specifies "~> 1.17" as the Elixir version requirement, and considering that Elixir 1.17 officially supports OTP/Erlang 26, the specified combination in the GitHub Actions workflow (Elixir 1.17 with OTP 26.0) is fully compatible and represents a stable configuration.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check Elixir and OTP version compatibility.
# Test: Output Elixir and Erlang/OTP versions. Expect: No compatibility issues.
elixir -v
Length of output: 108
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the project's configuration files for Elixir and OTP version requirements
rg -g "mix.exs" "elixir:" -A 3
rg -g "mix.exs" "otp:" -A 3
# Also check if there's any documentation about version requirements
fd README.md --exec cat {} \; | rg -i "elixir.*version|otp.*version|erlang.*version"
Length of output: 311
lib/charms/simd.ex (2)
14-14: LGTM: Parameter renaming is consistent with codebase changes
The renaming of block to blk aligns with the broader refactoring effort across the codebase.
Also applies to: 16-16
19-19: Verify MLIR API compatibility
The change from MLIR.is_null to MLIR.null? appears to be part of an API update. Let's verify this change is consistent across the codebase.
✅ Verification successful
API migration to MLIR.null? is complete and consistent
The codebase shows consistent usage of MLIR.null? across all MLIR-related null checks, with no remaining instances of the old MLIR.is_null API. The migration appears to be complete and properly implemented.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining instances of is_null to ensure complete migration
rg "MLIR\.is_null" --type elixir
# Search for new null? usage to verify consistency
rg "MLIR\.null\?" --type elixir
Length of output: 485
lib/charms/defm/pass/create_absent_func.ex (1)
30-30: LGTM: Parameter renaming is consistent
The renaming of block to blk matches the pattern seen across the codebase.
Also applies to: 37-37
lib/charms/pointer.ex (1)
70-70: LGTM: Consistent parameter renaming
The renaming of block to blk is consistent with the changes seen across other modules.
Also applies to: 72-72
mix.exs (2)
7-7: LGTM: Version bump aligns with dependency update
The version bump from 0.1.2-dev to 0.1.3-dev is appropriate for the beaver dependency update.
33-33: Verify beaver 0.4.0 compatibility
The update includes adding :beaver to extra_applications and updating the dependency version. Let's verify the compatibility of this version.
Also applies to: 78-78
✅ Verification successful
Beaver 0.4.0 dependency appears compatible with current usage
The codebase is using beaver 0.4.0 for MLIR operations and JIT compilation functionality. The dependency is properly locked in mix.lock and the usage patterns in the codebase (Application.ensure_started, MLIR operations, and JIT functions) align with beaver's core functionality. No breaking changes or compatibility issues are evident from the actual usage patterns.
- Used in
lib/charms/defm/definition.exfor MLIR module creation and manipulation - Used in
lib/charms/jit.exfor JIT compilation functionality - Properly declared in both mix.exs and mix.lock with version ~> 0.4.0
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for breaking changes in beaver 0.4.0
# Check the changelog or releases for breaking changes
gh api repos/beaver-lodge/beaver/releases/tags/v0.4.0 --jq '.body' || \
gh api repos/beaver-lodge/beaver/releases/latest --jq '.body'
# Look for any existing issues related to beaver 0.4.0
gh search issues "repo:beaver-lodge/beaver 0.4.0 is:issue"
Length of output: 720
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the actual repository and dependency information
# Check mix.exs for beaver dependency details
cat mix.exs
# Search for beaver usage in the codebase
rg "beaver" -l
Length of output: 2411
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the actual usage of beaver in the codebase
# Check the locked version in mix.lock
cat mix.lock
# Look at how beaver is used in the codebase
rg "beaver" -A 3 lib/charms/jit.ex lib/charms/defm.ex lib/charms/defm/definition.ex
Length of output: 5958
lib/charms/prelude.ex (1)
10-11: LGTM: Consistent parameter renaming
The renaming of block to blk is consistent with the changes across the codebase and maintains the same functionality.
Also applies to: 62-66
lib/charms/kernel.ex (1)
12-13: LGTM: Consistent parameter renaming
The renaming of block to blk across multiple functions maintains consistency with the codebase-wide changes while preserving the original functionality.
Also applies to: 32-33, 62-85
lib/charms/intrinsic.ex (1)
6-6: Verify all usages of the renamed struct field.
The renaming of :block to :blk in the Opts struct looks good and aligns with the project-wide standardization. However, this is a breaking change that requires verification of all usages.
✅ Verification successful
All usages of the struct field have been updated correctly
The verification shows that all occurrences are using the new :blk field name consistently across the codebase in lib/charms/{simd.ex,prelude.ex,kernel.ex,pointer.ex}. No instances of the old :block field name were found, confirming the renaming was complete and consistent.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for any remaining usages of the old field name
rg -l 'Opts.*block:' --type elixir
# Search for all usages of the new field name to ensure consistency
rg -l 'Opts.*blk:' --type elixir
Length of output: 155
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual usage context of the new field name in the files
rg 'Opts.*blk:' --type elixir -C 2
Length of output: 1739
test/expander_test.exs (2)
58-60: LGTM! More precise error assertion.
The updated error assertion provides better specificity by checking the exact error message pattern.
138-138: LGTM! Simplified MLIR verification calls.
The change from MLIR.Operation.verify!() to MLIR.verify!() aligns with beaver 0.4.0's API changes and improves code readability.
Also applies to: 164-164
lib/charms/defm/definition.ex (4)
156-156: LGTM! Simplified MLIR string conversion.
The change to use MLIR.to_string() directly improves code clarity.
182-182: LGTM! Consistent block parameter naming.
The renaming from block: to blk: aligns with the project-wide standardization effort.
Also applies to: 187-187
227-230: Good addition of application startup checks.
Ensuring required applications are started before compilation is a good defensive programming practice.
301-322: LGTM! Improved error handling with diagnostics.
The new error handling approach using MLIR.Context.with_diagnostics provides better error reporting and resource cleanup.
lib/charms/defm/expander.ex (5)
22-22: LGTM: Improved naming convention.
The change from Ub to UB in the alias makes it consistent with Elixir's uppercase module naming convention.
Line range hint 1014-1034: LGTM: Consistent control flow parameter naming.
The block parameter renaming in control flow operations (cond_br, if, while) maintains consistency while preserving the original logic. The changes are well-structured and maintain the semantic meaning of the operations.
Also applies to: 1046-1086, 1087-1120
177-177: LGTM: More idiomatic predicate naming.
Changed from is_null to null?, following Elixir's convention for predicate function names.
756-759: LGTM: Improved type safety with block validation.
Added explicit block type validation in pin operator expansion, which helps catch type-related issues earlier in the compilation process.
104-109: Verify consistent block parameter renaming across codebase.
The block parameter has been renamed from block to blk in multiple functions. While this change improves naming consistency, we should verify that this renaming is applied consistently across the entire codebase.
Also applies to: 120-121, 847-854
✅ Verification successful
Let me analyze the search results:
-
The
blkparameter is consistently used throughoutlib/charms/defm/expander.exandlib/charms/defm/definition.ex, showing the new naming convention is well applied. -
There's only one remaining instance of
blockinlib/charms/defm/pass/create_absent_func.ex, but it's using a different context - it's calling a functionmlirOperationGetBlockrather than being a parameter name.
Given this evidence, I can generate the final response:
Block parameter renaming verified as consistent
The renaming from block to blk has been consistently applied across all MLIR-related parameter usage in the codebase. The single remaining instance of "block" is part of a function name mlirOperationGetBlock, not a parameter.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining instances of 'block' parameter in MLIR-related code
# to ensure consistent renaming.
# Search for remaining 'block' parameter usage
rg -i '\bblock\b.*mlir' --type elixir
# Search for new 'blk' parameter usage to confirm consistency
rg -i '\bblk\b.*mlir' --type elixir
Length of output: 1719
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
charmslibrary to0.1.2.Bug Fixes
Chores
0.1.2-devto0.1.3-dev.:beaverto extra applications in the project configuration.:beaverto~> 0.4.0.Tests