Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I have been thinking about the errors in the multid nebular runs. I think a check at the end of the NLTE solver would be a good idea. We would need to check for two cases:
when the population may become sufficiently small to cause problems with floating point numbers. (On this point, I also think min pop should be changed to something larger, 1e-35 to ensure we are not close to the float limit)
The case when we have a population inversion. The division by the groundpop when we have a successful solution with a population inversion can cause significant problems at the point the partition function is cast from a double to a float. There is no physical justification for not allowing a population inversion thus simply setting the population to LTE might not be the best approach. Thus, I suggest some tolerance on what we would accept.
As such, I have attempted to introduce two checks on the solved populations. I believe the changes in the outputs are from numerical round-offs as the spec.out files are the same. Although I'd appreciate some sanity checking of the implementation for the 2nd case. Do you think there's a better way to implement this safety mechanism on the NLTE solver?