-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
add includeUnlisted #157
add includeUnlisted #157
Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request modifies the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/features/import-projects/giveth/service.ts (2)
Line range hint
4-33
: Consider documenting the behavior changeThe function now includes unlisted projects which is a significant behavior change. Consider:
- Adding a JSDoc comment explaining this behavior
- Updating any relevant documentation
Add documentation above the function:
+/** + * Fetches a batch of Giveth projects including unlisted ones. + * @param limit Maximum number of projects to fetch + * @param skip Number of projects to skip (for pagination) + * @returns Array of Giveth projects including unlisted ones + */ export const fetchGivethProjectsBatch = async (limit: number, skip: number) => {
Line range hint
29-32
: Consider enhancing error loggingThe current error logging could be more informative for debugging issues with unlisted projects.
Consider enhancing the error logging:
- console.log("error on fetchGivethProjectsBatch", error.message); + console.error("Failed to fetch Giveth projects batch", { + error: error.message, + params: { limit, skip }, + includesUnlisted: true + });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/features/import-projects/giveth/service.ts
(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/features/import-projects/giveth/service.ts (2)
Line range hint 14-22
: Verify type safety for unlisted projects
Please verify if unlisted projects have the same structure as listed ones. Consider:
- Adding type definitions if they differ
- Adding runtime validation for the response
Let's check for type definitions and usage:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:
Type safety is maintained across project imports
The codebase shows consistent type definitions for projects across different import sources:
- Giveth projects use
GivethProjectInfo
type - Each source (Giveth, RPGF, RetroList) has its own strongly-typed interface
- The common fields (id, title, image, slug, description) are present in the type definitions
- All imported projects are transformed into a common
Project
entity model before storage
The GraphQL query in the review is safe as it only requests fields that are guaranteed to exist in the source data structure.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for type definitions related to projects
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_Project {
$$$
}'
# Search for any validation logic
rg -g '!node_modules' 'validate.*Project|Project.*validate'
Length of output: 114
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to find type definitions and validations
# Search for type definitions in TypeScript files
rg -t typescript "type.*Project|interface.*Project" -A 10
# Search for GraphQL schema definitions
fd "schema.(ts|graphql)" --exec cat {}
# Look for any project-related types or interfaces
rg -t typescript "Project(\s*{|\s+extends|\s+implements)" -A 10
# Search for validation or transformation logic
rg -t typescript "(transform|validate|parse).*Project"
Length of output: 4006
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find project-related code
# Look for the specific file and its imports
rg -g "*.ts" "import.*Project" -A 2
# Search for project-related types in the specific feature directory
fd . src/features/import-projects --exec cat {} | rg "type|interface"
# Look for GraphQL query definitions
fd . src/features/import-projects --exec cat {} | rg "query|fragment"
# Search for any validation or transformation code in the import-projects directory
fd . src/features/import-projects --exec cat {} | rg "validate|transform|parse"
Length of output: 11251
13-13
: Verify access control implications of including unlisted projects
Including unlisted projects could potentially expose private or draft content. Please ensure this aligns with Giveth's access control policies.
Let's check for any access control mechanisms or documentation:
✅ Verification successful
The previous search didn't give us enough context. Let's examine the GraphQL query implementation, schema, and any related test files to understand if this is a supported parameter in the Giveth API and how it's being used.
Let's examine how the Giveth API is configured and how the fetched projects are processed to better understand the implications of including unlisted projects.
Including unlisted projects is safe and aligned with Giveth's API design
Based on the verification results:
- The
includeUnlisted
parameter is a supported feature of Giveth's public GraphQL API (endpoint: mainnet.serve.giveth.io) - The implementation is using the official Giveth API endpoint and following their query structure
- The data model (GraphQL schema) shows this is a read-only operation for project data
- Access control is handled at Giveth's API level, so if they expose unlisted projects through this parameter, it's intentional
Since this is utilizing a supported feature of Giveth's public API and the implementation follows their intended usage, there are no security concerns.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for related access control implementations
rg -g '!node_modules' -l 'includeUnlisted|isUnlisted|unlisted'
# Check for any documentation about unlisted projects
fd -g 'README*' -X cat
fd -g '*.md' -X grep -l -i 'unlisted'
Length of output: 1459
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the GraphQL query implementation and surrounding context
rg -A 10 -B 10 'includeUnlisted'
# Check for any GraphQL schema definitions
fd -e graphql -e gql -X cat
# Look for any test files related to this feature
fd -g '*giveth*.test.*' -X cat
fd -g '*giveth*.spec.*' -X cat
Length of output: 3891
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the GraphQL client implementation and configuration
rg -A 5 -B 5 'GIVETH_API_URL'
# Look for any environment variables or configuration related to Giveth
fd -g '*.env*' -X cat
fd -g '*config*' -X grep -i giveth
# Check the import mechanism and how projects are processed
ast-grep --pattern 'function fetchGivethProjectsBatch'
Length of output: 1858
Summary by CodeRabbit