Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add includeUnlisted #157

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 10, 2024
Merged

Conversation

MohammadPCh
Copy link
Collaborator

@MohammadPCh MohammadPCh commented Dec 10, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Enhanced project import functionality by including unlisted projects in the data retrieval process.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 10, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the fetchGivethProjectsBatch function in src/features/import-projects/giveth/service.ts by adding an includeUnlisted: true parameter to the GraphQL query for allProjects. This change allows the function to retrieve unlisted projects in addition to the listed ones. The error handling mechanism remains unchanged, continuing to log errors and return an empty array in case of a request failure.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/features/import-projects/giveth/service.ts Modified fetchGivethProjectsBatch to include includeUnlisted: true in the GraphQL query.

Possibly related PRs

  • Add fetching project #50: The changes in this PR involve the fetchGivethProjectsBatch function, which is directly related to the modifications made in the main PR regarding the GraphQL query for fetching Giveth projects.

Poem

In the fields where projects play,
A new parameter came to stay.
With unlisted gems now in sight,
Fetching them brings pure delight!
Errors logged, but fears are few,
Hopping forth, we gather new! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Experiment)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/features/import-projects/giveth/service.ts (2)

Line range hint 4-33: Consider documenting the behavior change

The function now includes unlisted projects which is a significant behavior change. Consider:

  1. Adding a JSDoc comment explaining this behavior
  2. Updating any relevant documentation

Add documentation above the function:

+/**
+ * Fetches a batch of Giveth projects including unlisted ones.
+ * @param limit Maximum number of projects to fetch
+ * @param skip Number of projects to skip (for pagination)
+ * @returns Array of Giveth projects including unlisted ones
+ */
 export const fetchGivethProjectsBatch = async (limit: number, skip: number) => {

Line range hint 29-32: Consider enhancing error logging

The current error logging could be more informative for debugging issues with unlisted projects.

Consider enhancing the error logging:

-    console.log("error on fetchGivethProjectsBatch", error.message);
+    console.error("Failed to fetch Giveth projects batch", {
+      error: error.message,
+      params: { limit, skip },
+      includesUnlisted: true
+    });
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 65cb3cc and 25e25fb.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/features/import-projects/giveth/service.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/features/import-projects/giveth/service.ts (2)

Line range hint 14-22: Verify type safety for unlisted projects

Please verify if unlisted projects have the same structure as listed ones. Consider:

  1. Adding type definitions if they differ
  2. Adding runtime validation for the response

Let's check for type definitions and usage:

✅ Verification successful

Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response:

Type safety is maintained across project imports

The codebase shows consistent type definitions for projects across different import sources:

  • Giveth projects use GivethProjectInfo type
  • Each source (Giveth, RPGF, RetroList) has its own strongly-typed interface
  • The common fields (id, title, image, slug, description) are present in the type definitions
  • All imported projects are transformed into a common Project entity model before storage

The GraphQL query in the review is safe as it only requests fields that are guaranteed to exist in the source data structure.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for type definitions related to projects
ast-grep --pattern 'interface $_Project {
  $$$
}'

# Search for any validation logic
rg -g '!node_modules' 'validate.*Project|Project.*validate'

Length of output: 114


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try different approaches to find type definitions and validations

# Search for type definitions in TypeScript files
rg -t typescript "type.*Project|interface.*Project" -A 10

# Search for GraphQL schema definitions
fd "schema.(ts|graphql)" --exec cat {}

# Look for any project-related types or interfaces
rg -t typescript "Project(\s*{|\s+extends|\s+implements)" -A 10

# Search for validation or transformation logic
rg -t typescript "(transform|validate|parse).*Project"

Length of output: 4006


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach to find project-related code

# Look for the specific file and its imports
rg -g "*.ts" "import.*Project" -A 2

# Search for project-related types in the specific feature directory
fd . src/features/import-projects --exec cat {} | rg "type|interface"

# Look for GraphQL query definitions
fd . src/features/import-projects --exec cat {} | rg "query|fragment"

# Search for any validation or transformation code in the import-projects directory
fd . src/features/import-projects --exec cat {} | rg "validate|transform|parse"

Length of output: 11251


13-13: Verify access control implications of including unlisted projects

Including unlisted projects could potentially expose private or draft content. Please ensure this aligns with Giveth's access control policies.

Let's check for any access control mechanisms or documentation:

✅ Verification successful

The previous search didn't give us enough context. Let's examine the GraphQL query implementation, schema, and any related test files to understand if this is a supported parameter in the Giveth API and how it's being used.


Let's examine how the Giveth API is configured and how the fetched projects are processed to better understand the implications of including unlisted projects.


Including unlisted projects is safe and aligned with Giveth's API design

Based on the verification results:

  1. The includeUnlisted parameter is a supported feature of Giveth's public GraphQL API (endpoint: mainnet.serve.giveth.io)
  2. The implementation is using the official Giveth API endpoint and following their query structure
  3. The data model (GraphQL schema) shows this is a read-only operation for project data
  4. Access control is handled at Giveth's API level, so if they expose unlisted projects through this parameter, it's intentional

Since this is utilizing a supported feature of Giveth's public API and the implementation follows their intended usage, there are no security concerns.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for related access control implementations
rg -g '!node_modules' -l 'includeUnlisted|isUnlisted|unlisted' 

# Check for any documentation about unlisted projects
fd -g 'README*' -X cat
fd -g '*.md' -X grep -l -i 'unlisted'

Length of output: 1459


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the GraphQL query implementation and surrounding context
rg -A 10 -B 10 'includeUnlisted' 

# Check for any GraphQL schema definitions
fd -e graphql -e gql -X cat

# Look for any test files related to this feature
fd -g '*giveth*.test.*' -X cat
fd -g '*giveth*.spec.*' -X cat

Length of output: 3891


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the GraphQL client implementation and configuration
rg -A 5 -B 5 'GIVETH_API_URL'

# Look for any environment variables or configuration related to Giveth
fd -g '*.env*' -X cat
fd -g '*config*' -X grep -i giveth

# Check the import mechanism and how projects are processed
ast-grep --pattern 'function fetchGivethProjectsBatch'

Length of output: 1858

@MohammadPCh MohammadPCh merged commit 2cbe435 into develop Dec 10, 2024
@MohammadPCh MohammadPCh deleted the feat/giveth-include-unlisted-projects branch December 10, 2024 09:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant