-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Request new match #74
Conversation
this pr is kinda critical as it probably breaks all other open and future prs due to massive merge conflicts |
I agree, I think we should first merge #71 and then merge this one |
Can we also merge this directly into main? |
Yes we can. But what happened to the concept of the pre-production branch? |
As long as this branch is a branch of the development branch it is fine, we just need to remember to merge main into development before starting something new |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
General Notes:
- I am not getting a new match, only the one I have been matched with before, we need to safe the previous match in the db and then just skip them when matching
commands/match/match-command.ts
Outdated
import findMatchingUser from '../../functions/findMatchingUser'; | ||
import conversationStarter from '../../functions/conversationStarter'; | ||
|
||
export const sendQuestion = async (interaction: any) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why are we declaring the sendQuestion function and not just importing the old one?
commands/match/match-command.ts
Outdated
sendQuestion(interaction); | ||
} else { | ||
await interaction.reply({ | ||
content: 'Bitte beantworte den Meinungstest vollständig, bevor du mit Anderen gematcht werden kannst! Bitte nutze dazu den Befehl `/test`.', |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could we maybe automatically trigger the test command if the user has not finished the test?
Also could you think of a way where we could put a button that starts the /match command to make it easier for users to find this feature? |
please don't use feature branches to completely re-structure the entire codebase in the future |
Fix #42