feat: Add Multi-Language Support for Application Labels

[zhengkunwang223]

No description provided.

[f2c-ci-robot]

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

[f2c-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from zhengkunwang223. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

The provided Go code has several improvements to ensure consistency, readability, and functionality. Here are the specific changes:

1. Import Adjustments:

   • Import github.com/gin-gonic/gin instead of importing all packages at once.

2. Method Parameters:

   • Changed method parameters to use pointers (*request.AppSearch) to avoid unnecessary copying and potential memory allocation problems.

3. Loop Variables:

   • Removed unused variables from loops that did not contribute to meaningful computation.

4. Error Handling for Unmarshaling:

   • Added error handling after unmarshalling JSON data using _ = ....

5. Language Support:

   • Extracted language support into a utility function such as common.GetLang, which reduces repetition and provides better abstraction.

6. String Case Conversion:

   • Used strings.ToLower() consistently for lowercase conversions.

7. Consistent Return Type:

   • Ensured consistent return types across similar methods where applicable.

Here is a concise summary of these changes:

• Refactored Imports: Simplified imports by splitting them into separate lines for clarity.

• Updated Method Signatures: Enhanced method signatures with pointer receivers for better performance when modifying object instances within methods.

• Removed Unused Variables: Eliminated unnecessary intermediate variable assignments, especially in looping constructs like for-loops.

• Enhanced Error Handling: Added more detailed error checks in certain parts, specifically related to JSON parsing operations.

These modifications can greatly enhance the reliability, maintainability, and performance of the application, making it easier to read, debug, and optimize.

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

The provided code differs slightly between the two struct definitions. In the first version, you have used model.Tag directly in the Tags field of the AppDTO, while in the second version, you have replaced it with an embedded TagDTO. This change requires corresponding adjustments to handle serialization and deserialization.

Here is the corrected and optimized version:

// Corrected tags field in AppDTO
type AppDTO struct {
	Name        string   `json:"name"`
	Key         string   `json:"key"`
	ID           uint     `json:"id"`
	ShortDescZh string   `json:"shortDescZh"`
	ShortDescEn string   `json:"shortDescEn"`
	Icon        string   `json:"icon"`
	Type        string   `json:"type"`
	Status      string   `json:"status"`
	Resource    string   `json:"resource"`
	Installed   bool     `json:"installed"`
	Versions    []string `json:"versions"`
	Limit       int      `json:"limit"`
	Tags        []TagDTO `json:"tags"` // Embedded TagDTO now
}

// Optimized TagDTO structure (not required if using Model.Tag)
type TagDTO struct {
	ID   uint   `json:"id"`  // Optional if using model.Tag
	Key  string `json:"key"`
	Name string `json:"name"`
}

Key Changes:

1. Embedded vs Direct Usage: The Tags field in AppDTO was changed from []model.Tag to []TagDTO.
2. Optional Fields: If you intend to use model.Tag, you can remove the optional fields (ID, Key, etc.) in TagDTO. However, if not needed, keeping them provides more flexibility for customizing the tag data.
3. Serialization/Deserialization: Ensure that both TagDTO and model.Tag implement the necessary interfaces (like marshaling and unmarshaling) so as not to cause errors during JSON operations.

This ensures proper handling and compatibility between the structs, especially when dealing with JSON encoding/decoding.

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

The provided code has a few areas that can be improved:

Type Definitions

1. ExtraProperties Struct: The Tags field is now a slice of Tag, which seems correct.
2. AppProperty Struct: This structure does not contain any changes, so it should remain unchanged.
3. Translation Struct: A new struct Translation has been introduced for handling translations in multiple languages.

type Translation struct {
 En   string `json:"en"`
 Ja   string `json:"ja"`
 Ms   string `json:"ms"`
 PtBr string `json:"pt-br"`
 Ru   string `json:"ru"`
 Tw   string `json:"tw"`
 Zh   string `json:"zh"`
}

4. AppGroup Struct: Introduced a new Groups field to store additional groups within an application and included the Translations field to extend the translation support within these groups.

type AppGroup struct {
 Key          string      `json:"key"` // Unique identifier for the group
 Sort         int         `json:"sort"`       // Position order within the app's categories/groups list
 Translations Translation `json:"translations"` // Additional text properties per language
}

5. AppForm Struct: No significant changes identified.

Potential Improvements

• Ensure all dependencies used throughout this structure are properly imported at the beginning.
• Consider using pointers for fields like Key, Sort, SupportVersion if they might ever need to be updated or modified after initialization.
• For performance reasons, you might consider using more efficient container types if applicable (e.g., slices over arrays).
• Add documentation comments to each struct member to maintain clarity on their purposes and usage within different parts of the system.

These improvements will enhance readability, flexibility, and efficiency while maintaining the integrity and correctness of your data structure. If there are specific areas of concern or further requirements, please let me know!

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

There are no irregularities or potential issues in the provided Go code snippets, and no specific optimization suggestions.

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

The provided code differences seem minor but can be considered for some improvements. Here's an optimized version with additional comments:

package model

import (
)

type AppDTO struct {
}

type AppItem struct {
	Name        string   `json:"name"`
	Key         string   `json:"key"`
	ID          uint     `json:"id"`
	ShortDescZh string   `json:"shortDescZh"`
	ShortDescEn string   `json:"shortDescEn"`
	Icon        string   `json:"icon"`
	Type        string   `json:"type"`
	Status      string   `json:"status"`
	Resource    string   `json:"resource"`
	Installed   bool     `json:"installed"`
	Versions    []string `json:"versions"`
	Limit       int      `json:"limit"`
	Tags        []TagDTO `json:"tags"` // Optimized to use interface
}

// TagDTO includes only ID, Key, and Name fields which represent core tag properties.
type TagDTO struct {
	ID   uint   `json:"id" form:"-"`
	Key  string `json:"key" form:"-" xml:"-" swaggerignore`
	Name string `json:"name" form:"-" xml:"-"`
}

type AppInstalledCheck struct {

}

Suggestions:

1. Interface Usage: The Tags field is now defined as []TagDTO, assuming that TagDTO has a method signature appropriate for its intended usage (e.g., comparison).
2. Simplification of AppItem: While not strictly necessary without additional context, simplifying the AppItem structure by using a common base could improve readability.

These changes make the code easier to understand and maintain while maintaining functionality.

[wanghe-fit2cloud]

Your proposed changes seem to be correct and align with typical Go struct definitions and JSON serialization practices. Here's a quick review of what they entail:

1. Locale Struct: This addition allows tags to include localized text fields (e.g., "en", "ja", etc.), which can be useful for displaying names or descriptions in different languages.

2. Optimization Suggestions:

   • Since you've added this feature but haven't used it, consider whether locale information is frequently accessed alongside other tag attributes. If not, potentially remove or refactor this functionality.

3. Potential Issues:

   • Ensure that if you plan to implement locale localization, there are appropriate methods or hooks to retrieve translated strings.
   • Verify compatibility across multiple versions of your application where locales might need to change dynamically.

Overall, these changes maintain data integrity and flexibility by allowing tagging systems to support multilingual content. Let me know if you need further assistance!

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
1 New issue
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud