Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Review joint limits passed to Cartesian controller #2

Open
PeterBowman opened this issue May 3, 2018 · 4 comments
Open

Review joint limits passed to Cartesian controller #2

PeterBowman opened this issue May 3, 2018 · 4 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@PeterBowman
Copy link
Member

PeterBowman commented May 3, 2018

These are current defaults as read by amor_get_joint_info and passed on to the solver device via yarp::os::Property:

(maxs (-65.001602 35.002976 150.00412 -40.001831 0.0 179.997253 0.0))
(mins (-155.002976 -130.003204 -150.00412 -178.003204 0.0 1.999542 0.0))

According to the user manual, those values are referred to the neutral position, which is not the starting (home) robot pose (BTW note how infinite rotation implies 0.0 at joints A4 and A6). We used to set them via .ini file until roboticslab-uc3m/kinematics-dynamics#145.

@PeterBowman
Copy link
Member Author

BTW those 0.0 are the reason behind roboticslab-uc3m/kinematics-dynamics@4557220.

@PeterBowman
Copy link
Member Author

Same bug affects the AmorControlboard device at yarp-devices.

  • Option 1: apply correction at AmorCartesianControl (store neutral pose and substract angles), then replicate at AmorControlboard. Thus, we'll have duplicates (DRY rule?).
  • Option 2: change those values in the AMOR API itself.

@PeterBowman
Copy link
Member Author

Don't forget to check joint limits in simulation afterwards: roboticslab-uc3m/amor-openrave-models#1.

@PeterBowman
Copy link
Member Author

PeterBowman commented Jun 7, 2022

Commit roboticslab-uc3m/yarp-devices@bd153db introduces a workaround for unbounded joints (A4 and A6), forcing a [-180º,180º] rotation range.

@PeterBowman PeterBowman transferred this issue from roboticslab-uc3m/kinematics-dynamics Dec 3, 2023
@PeterBowman PeterBowman changed the title [AmorCartesianControl] Review joint limits Review joint limits passed to Cartesian controller Dec 3, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant