You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Additional kapt matchers can be defined using additionalKaptMatchers in the extension, but what about processors which aren't defined? If a processor is present in the project but not defined in ModuleCheck, it will currently default to "unused" and fail the task.
Valid options seem to be:
Strict mode
fail the task with a reason such as "undefined kapt processor"
this would require the developer to add the processor to additionalKaptMatchers in order to continue.
Warning mode
log a warning that there's an undefined processor and suggest adding it
Silent mode
Don't do anything.
This seems somewhat valid if the developer only cares about the big named processors, perhaps maybe only Dagger. Silent mode is a quick and dirty way of getting what they need without the hassle of adding anything else.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Additional kapt matchers can be defined using
additionalKaptMatchers
in the extension, but what about processors which aren't defined? If a processor is present in the project but not defined in ModuleCheck, it will currently default to "unused" and fail the task.Valid options seem to be:
additionalKaptMatchers
in order to continue.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: