Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Have new_data() call xnew_data() when only seq and length_out are specified. #40

Open
joethorley opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 2 comments
Open

Have new_data() call xnew_data() when only seq and length_out are specified. #40

joethorley opened this issue Jan 3, 2025 · 2 comments
Labels
Difficulty: Intermediate Effort: Medium Importance: Medium Timeline: Soon Type: Refactor zSkills: Software Development

Comments

@joethorley
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@joethorley joethorley changed the title Have new_data() call xnew_data() when only seq is specified. Have new_data() call xnew_data() when only seq and length_out are specified. Jan 3, 2025
joethorley added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 3, 2025
@joethorley
start calling xnew_data issue #40
671970e
@joethorley
Copy link
Member Author

Got to

  if(missing(ref) && missing(obs_only)) {
    args <- c(list(.data = data, .length_out = length_out), seq)
    # TODO: make work when seq is specified
   if(missing(seq)) {
      return(do.call("xnew_data", args = args))
    }
  }

@joethorley
Copy link
Member Author

Actually will also need xcast()

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Difficulty: Intermediate Effort: Medium Importance: Medium Timeline: Soon Type: Refactor zSkills: Software Development
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@joethorley