We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
As far as I can make out pine nuts are now not considered as nuts for the nutriscore calculation. They are mentioned in https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9268614/ as tree nuts and should be included.
see https://world.openfoodfacts.org/cgi/search.pl?action=process&tagtype_0=categories&tag_contains_0=contains&tag_0=pine%20nuts&sort_by=unique_scans_n&page_size=20&axis_x=energy&axis_y=nutrition-score-fr&series_nutrition_grades=on&graph=1
This would move many nuts from a median Nutriscore C to Nutriscore A.
more realistic
Some 800 products have been classified as pine nuts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
It seems also an issue for other nuts
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
What
As far as I can make out pine nuts are now not considered as nuts for the nutriscore calculation. They are mentioned in https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9268614/ as tree nuts and should be included.
Steps to reproduce the behavior
see https://world.openfoodfacts.org/cgi/search.pl?action=process&tagtype_0=categories&tag_contains_0=contains&tag_0=pine%20nuts&sort_by=unique_scans_n&page_size=20&axis_x=energy&axis_y=nutrition-score-fr&series_nutrition_grades=on&graph=1
Expected behavior
This would move many nuts from a median Nutriscore C to Nutriscore A.
Why
more realistic
Number of products impacted
Some 800 products have been classified as pine nuts.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: