You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I concur with this. Cranial nerves as part of CNS are EMAPA legacy, followed (apparently incorrectly) in MA construction. Seems most appropriate to give EMAPA:17264 "cranial nerve" a part-of relationship to EMAPA:16469 "nervous system", and its subclasses redistributed to relevant part-of parents.
Also, on the same topic, EMAPA subtypes ganglion into CNS and PNS ganglion, with the cranial ganglia under CNS ganglion
I believe all vertebrate ganglia should by definition be PNS. I think "CNS ganglion" is being used to group the two developmental stages of all (PNS) cranial ganglia
EMAPA:32846 ! ganglion
is_a EMAPA:16658 ! central nervous system ganglion ***
po EMAPA:16659 ! cranial ganglion
po EMAPA:36064 ! cranial preganglion
I don't understand the distinction between CNS nerve and PNS nerve. Shouldn't all nerves be PNS?
with the exception of the optic 'nerve', aren't all cranial nerves in the PNS?
Maybe the distinction is for capturing origin/root: brain vs spinal cord?
MA has a somewhat similar structure
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: