You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
gut enteroendocrine cells have classically been thought of as a diverse set of cell types each of which secretes one hormone. Recent data questions this, finding evidence for multiple hormones per cell type, a restricted number of lineage, some level of plasticity and evidence that different hormones may be expressed at different levels of maturity.
The purpose of this ticket is to review new data and evidence to decide how we should modify CL to reflect it. One possibility would be to keep classical terms as classifications and overlay a more modern understanding on top of that. More radically, we could re-organise to reflect new understanding of lineage.
Gehart, Helmuth, Johan H. van Es, Karien Hamer, Joep Beumer, Kai Kretzschmar, Johanna F. Dekkers, Anne Rios, and Hans Clevers. 2019. “Identification of Enteroendocrine Regulators by Real-Time Single-Cell Differentiation Mapping.” Cell 176 (5): 1158-1173.e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2018.12.029.
Hysenaj, Franc, Michael Lauber, Andrea Bast-Habersbrunner, Markus List, and Martin Klingenspor. 2024. “Single-Cell Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Secretin as a Hallmark of Human Enteroendocrine Cell Maturation.” Scientific Reports 14 (1): 13525. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-63699-0.
Older review - includes morphology details: Latorre, R., C. Sternini, R. De Giorgio, and B. Greenwood-Van Meerveld. 2016. “Enteroendocrine Cells: A Review of Their Role in Brain-Gut Communication.” Neurogastroenterology and Motility: The Official Journal of the European Gastrointestinal Motility Society 28 (5): 620–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/nmo.12754.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Background:
The purpose of this ticket is to review new data and evidence to decide how we should modify CL to reflect it. One possibility would be to keep classical terms as classifications and overlay a more modern understanding on top of that. More radically, we could re-organise to reflect new understanding of lineage.
Key papers to review:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: