JMESPath community is accepting new proposals to update the specification #16
Replies: 5 comments 16 replies
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Did you check with the authors of the original repositories? Are they abandoning their version? Some notes should be added to the readme explaining why this community version is needed and why you chose to do it under a different organisation. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
As a former AWS employee who worked with the creators of this project, I'm happy to reach out to them and see if I can get their attention. I too have run into numerous issues with so many things being woefully out of date. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hello JMESPath community.
We are a small group of developers who are interested in taking on the mantle of maintaining this wonderful bit of technology. We have already done a significant amount of work combing through the existing repositories looking for feature requests and discussions on various topics, collecting it all under a new GitHub organization: jmespath-community.
This project exists as the original implementation does not appear to be maintained and has not received any improvements for a long time. After multiple attempts to contact the original author, we decided to proceed further with this project.
With the exception of the language implementations, we have consolidated everything into two repositories:
jmespath.spec is our repository to house all specification, testing, and discussion around the language. Previously it was being spread across the website repository and a few of the implementations.
Then there is the refactored website, that now automatically draws all of its content from the jmespath.spec repository, de-duplicating and streamlining updates to the language. We have this site hosted at https://jmespath.site/. (We would appreciate any CSS contributions too :)
Together, we would like to introduce a community effort that aims to maintain and improve JMESPath going forward.
Please join us in deciding on the next iteration of the JMESPath specification.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions