pygments.rb options not working

[trilader]

Today I installed octopress to build a blog. When I tried to add a code block to an article using either the backtick or the codeblock syntax things like linenos:false or start:51 don't work and get put into the title.

According to the documentation available at http://octopress.org/docs/plugins/codeblock/ and http://octopress.org/docs/blogging/code/ it should work like this:

{% codeblock lang:bash FooBar test text linenos:false %}
echo "Hello World"
exit 1
{% endcodeblock %}

The resulting code highlight has a title of "FooBar test text linenos:false" instead of the expected "FooBar test text" and line numbers which it should not have.

[wJsJwr]

I was also stuck in the problem for a while, and then I checked the source code. It seems that some options like mark and linenos have been removed, and the syntax becomes:

{% codeblock [title] [url] [link text] %}
code snippet
{% endcodeblock %}

I don't know why these useful options are removed, the current version is too simple.

[parkr]

@wJsJwr Are you talking about the current code on master, or your code locally?

[wJsJwr]

@parkr I'm talking about the current code on master, since I cloned it just two weeks ago.
I checked a bit more and found that the rich-option version just the fix to Issue #584 , and I found your comment :-).
So from that time, those options have been already removed from the source, maybe I should merge these two version: current master & 2.1, to get the fully functioned codeblock.

[GR360RY]

Did somebody managed to find the commit that should be merged into master that fixes this issue ?

[ramsey]

I'm having this problem, too.

[shidarin]

Thought I was crazy when I ran into this on both codeblocks and backtick blocks, I've been pulling my hair out.

Looking at the code in 2.1 around the time of the commit for the markup and the sass code now, things have drastically changed to the point where a simple merge from back then would not rectify this issue- at least a simple merge by me, unfamiliar with the codebase.

This is really disappointing, because the fancy line numbers and code highlighting demos on the octopress webpage were why I picked up Octopress. I ended up cloning the site-2.1 branch directly- which is the Octopress page itself. Reset the theme with 'rake install', remove all the content and set the config to your liking and you've got a site with at LEAST the same features as the Octopress page.

[skelz0r]

Same here.

[parkr]

It's not released yet. I'll change the docs.

[parkr]

Check out octopress/docs#16

[pwntester]

Is it going to be released? or its been removed for good?

[shidarin]

It's never been merged into master. If I'm following the tree correctly, it's still in and a part of the 3.0 release (currently in alpha2?)

[simonewebdesign]

Same problem here.

[wsargent]

Just ran into this today. It would be nice to have line numbers.

[parkr]

@wsargent The code in #1590 should fix this for you.