Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FE-Conversion numbers are off. #18

Open
Bluberry-Kat opened this issue Jul 25, 2019 · 3 comments
Open

FE-Conversion numbers are off. #18

Bluberry-Kat opened this issue Jul 25, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@Bluberry-Kat
Copy link
Contributor

in thermionics, conversion between different kinds of energies is lossless. this is intentional and expected.
in 4be2741, rotary : FE conversion was added.
i'm sure the numbers look correct on paper.
however, they do not function correctly in practice.
image
in the above image is two almost-identical setups. one turns heat into rotary and powers a hammer mill.
the other turns heat into FE, which gets turned into rotary and powers a hammer mill.
in theory, they should run at the same speed. to test this i ran the hammer mills simultaneously for 5 minutes.
these are the results.
image
the left barrel is the FE-powered mill, the right barrel is the heat-powered mill.
this is a huge discrepancy, and, i suspect, in the right environment, could potentially be a dupe-bug for FE.

@falkreon
Copy link
Member

One firebox should be starving the motor regardless of what you do. Does this repro with 5?

@falkreon
Copy link
Member

Anyway I definitely don't consider speed a problem here. RF has always had an advantage in buffering and transmitting power. What I'd be worried about is if, say, 256 coal on the RF side produced more gravel than 256 coal on the direct-drive side.

@Bluberry-Kat
Copy link
Contributor Author

Bluberry-Kat commented Jul 25, 2019

a similar setup.
image
both sides have 5 fireboxes, 8 coal each, 40 total (per side)
left side is the FE-powered one. right side is the heat-powered one. similar result. less of a discrepancy, but still noticeable.

a somewhat more compelling setup:
image
this setup, theoretically, will generate more energy than it consumes.
to test this, i put some energy in a battery. not a ton.
image
then i plug it into the motor, aaand..
image
bam. free energy. and it'll keep going endlessly without intervention. this is certainly unintended.

EDIT: i suspect this might not be a problem with the numbers, but perhaps an oversight in how FE is consumed with the RF Motor. shrug.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants