Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

summarize price offering on OTC in regard to resources used for EOTDL dataset/model hosting and delivery #261

Open
achtsnits opened this issue Nov 11, 2024 · 1 comment
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@achtsnits
Copy link
Collaborator

achtsnits commented Nov 11, 2024

relevant costs for EOTDL dataset/model hosting and delivery (free + premium):

  • Base Load: machines for EOTDL API + supporting services.
  • Free Tier: fixed machine pool for free users.
  • Premium Tier: autoscaling pool (larger/GPU-enabled) for premium users.
  • NFS Storage: elastic storage for user home filesystems.
  • Object Storage:
    • For large datasets/models: storage costs for data; no network cost if staged to workspace hub, but network egress applies for user downloads.
    • For cached extracted datasets/models: storage costs only, mounted on workspace hub (no network costs).

differences in regard to pricing and included quotas between OTC eu_nl (CDSE scientific prices) and OTC eu_de (regular)
image

Network -100% applies to direct S3 access as well as outbound traffic from machines, so there is (should be) no egress costs! Note: https://documentation.dataspace.copernicus.eu/Quotas.html (eu_nl!) specifies a monthly transfer limit for direct S3 access (throttled but not charged beyond limit), seems that that applies to outbound traffic from machines as well (on EOTDL datasets/models are accessed via EOTDL API and not direct S3!)

@juansensio
Copy link
Collaborator

@tatimars please follow up

@juansensio juansensio added this to the v1.13 milestone Jan 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants