-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Sort entries in bib
files.
#389
Comments
Just out of curiosity: If you run We can also provide our own stylefile, similar to clang-format. |
So far, I count 44 duplicates in our publication list. I will have a look a them tomorrow and sort them out (probably finding some false positives on the way)
|
biber found 109 (!) duplicates when calling
|
|
biber
offers the option to sort all entries inbib
files (see 3.1.7 in biber doc).Although this brings no potential benefit for publication lists of previous years, I think this would be quite useful for the current year and upcoming ones. It would be a lot easier to find duplicate entries early if we sort by author for example.
I can also imagine including a check like
indent
from the main repository: We can check if the sortedbib
file differs from the one in a PR, and request the author to change it. It is also not difficult to add asort
target to the makefile.The check in #388 is a good first step to find duplicates. However, it only covers duplicate bibtex keys. With a sorted publication list, it would be easier to find real duplicates.
What do you think? I am confident that I can prepare a patch in a few minutes :)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: