We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
dm_filter()
dm_apply_filters_impl() should be a reduce(~ dm_get_filtered_table(...)) , not a map(...) , with a suitable ordering of the tables.
dm_apply_filters_impl()
reduce(~ dm_get_filtered_table(...))
map(...)
Trigger: tidyverse/duckplyr#441 .
Needs duckdb/duckdb-r#949 to show an effect with duckplyr.
For remote databases (and duck tables), perhaps we want to materialize a "skeleton dm", with only the keys?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
dm_apply_filters_impl()
should be areduce(~ dm_get_filtered_table(...))
, not amap(...)
, with a suitable ordering of the tables.Trigger: tidyverse/duckplyr#441 .
Needs duckdb/duckdb-r#949 to show an effect with duckplyr.
For remote databases (and duck tables), perhaps we want to materialize a "skeleton dm", with only the keys?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: