You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Currently the QCD background is estimated using a same-sign control-region, and then normalized to the opposite-sign signal region with an ad-hoc transfer factor of 0.80. As suggested by Stefan, this transfer factor could and should be measured from a separate control region, as done for the actual Run-1 result. However, having separate control regions for different purposes can make the code a bit messy, so it might be better to have a separate script to determine this transfer factor.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I've here a very simple script, which uses the antiiso region on ntuple level to estimate the extrapolation factor: https://gist.github.com/stwunsch/8b184f88266d7ac196195a94adace7f1
I get 0.92 ;) However, no fit, no uncertainties, but probably we're fine with that?
(from #7 - @slaurila )
Currently the QCD background is estimated using a same-sign control-region, and then normalized to the opposite-sign signal region with an ad-hoc transfer factor of 0.80. As suggested by Stefan, this transfer factor could and should be measured from a separate control region, as done for the actual Run-1 result. However, having separate control regions for different purposes can make the code a bit messy, so it might be better to have a separate script to determine this transfer factor.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: