For Cycle #13

[niyid]

Summary

Specify the total amount of BSQ you are requesting:

• BSQ requested:

1950 BSQ

Contributions delivered

Provide links to contributions you have delivered, the amount of BSQ you are requesting for each, and any comments that will help stakeholders understand its value.

• Show reputation balance in BSQ wallet stats bisq#3352 - 500 BSQ
• Launch in Limbo with BisqException when last navigation no longer exists bisq#3510 - 1,300 BSQ (1,000 BSQ for discovery of critical "showstopper" bug and 300 BSQ for resolution)
• DAO governance open proposals show delete icon on wrong items bisq#3899 - 50 BSQ
• Vote Reveal - Silent Fail bisq#3408 - 100 BSQ

Contributions in progress

Provide links to work you're involved with that is still in progress. This section is optional, and is for your own benefit in keeping track of what you're doing and keeping other contributors up to date with the same.

• Add and rename Portfolio History columns meaningfully bisq#3338 (Awaiting ACK from reviewer)
• Feature Request: Show password on login bisq#3854 (Awaiting ACK from reviewer)
• Remove unused i18n strings bisq#3860 (Awaiting ACK from reviewer)

Roles performed

Provide links to your monthly report on any roles you are responsible for.

[sqrrm]

It's hard to review work done when issues solved are linked but not the solution. Linking PRs would be better.

bisq-network/bisq#3352
bisq-network/bisq#3510

I think these items are asking too much. The value is limited and it shouldn't take much work to implement. These items seem to have been rejected in previous CRs as well.

bisq-network/bisq#3899

This has also been rejected before from what I understand, and it's not priority. At least a more reasonable amount requested.

bisq-network/bisq#3408

This took a lot of review resources due to untested and poorly and was later reverted. Should not get any compensation.

As stand in team lead I reject this request.

[niyid]

I did not get the part this part regarding bisq-network/bisq#3408 :

This took a lot of review resources due to untested and poorly and was later reverted. Should not get any compensation.

On the others, I can review the figures if you are open to another review.

[MwithM]

There's a reimbursement request with TXID 15ffe6e6f27250c6f345bf2747217b6654ec7a1ce1035918c19c3de8b2df78b7 requesting 1950 BSQ, the same amount of this issue.
It's ok to submit requests even when they're not approved by team leaders, but why did you do a proposal for reimbursement instead of compensation?

[niyid]

That was an error. It was meant to be a compensation request.

…

On Sun, 24 May 2020, 18:42 MwithM, ***@***.***> wrote: There's a reimbursement request with TXID 15ffe6e6f27250c6f345bf2747217b6654ec7a1ce1035918c19c3de8b2df78b7 requesting 1950 BSQ, the same amount of this issue. It's ok to submit requests even when they're not approved by team leaders, but why did you do a proposal for reimbursement instead of compensation? — You are receiving this because you authored the thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#553 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AE2MWR5M4DE2ALCKEI6XXBTRTFL7XANCNFSM4M22P7HA> .

[MwithM]

was:rejected