You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Summary
We are proposing the development of a new DocumentViewer module to address the limitations of the current document viewer, which struggles with larger PDFs and lacks specific functionality for enhanced user interaction.
Current Limitations Inability to display base64 PDFs larger than 2MB
The current document viewer fails to render PDFs larger than 2MB when encoded in base64. This limits the ability to handle larger files, which is a common use case for document-heavy applications (See issue: #35917).
No support for individual page rotation in multi-page PDFs
The existing viewer does not allow users to rotate individual pages within a multi-page PDF document. This lack of fine-grained control affects the usability of PDFs with pages that need orientation adjustments (See issue: #35756).
Why should this be worked on?
Enhanced user experience with larger documents
Greater control over the document viewing process
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is there an existing issue for this?
Summary
Summary
We are proposing the development of a new DocumentViewer module to address the limitations of the current document viewer, which struggles with larger PDFs and lacks specific functionality for enhanced user interaction.
Current Limitations
Inability to display base64 PDFs larger than 2MB
The current document viewer fails to render PDFs larger than 2MB when encoded in base64. This limits the ability to handle larger files, which is a common use case for document-heavy applications (See issue: #35917).
No support for individual page rotation in multi-page PDFs
The existing viewer does not allow users to rotate individual pages within a multi-page PDF document. This lack of fine-grained control affects the usability of PDFs with pages that need orientation adjustments (See issue: #35756).
Why should this be worked on?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: