Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Remove MetaMask Institutional code #29782

Open
1 of 9 tasks
shane-t opened this issue Jan 17, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #29748
Open
1 of 9 tasks

Remove MetaMask Institutional code #29782

shane-t opened this issue Jan 17, 2025 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #29748
Assignees
@shane-t
Labels
INVALID-ISSUE-TEMPLATE Issue's body doesn't match any issue template.

Comments

@shane-t
Copy link
Member

shane-t commented Jan 17, 2025 •
edited
Loading

What is this about?

Steps

  1. Remove tests (PR)

Acceptance Criteria

  • Fenced code is removed
  • Build types are removed
  • Extra code is removed
  • Extra dependencies are removed

Stakeholder review needed before the work gets merged

  • Engineering (needed in most cases)
  • Design
  • Product
  • QA (automation tests are required to pass before merging PRs but not all changes are covered by automation tests - please review if QA is needed beyond automation tests)
  • Security
  • Legal
  • Marketing
  • Management (please specify)
  • Other (please specify)

References

No response
@shane-t shane-t self-assigned this Jan 17, 2025
@metamaskbot metamaskbot added the INVALID-ISSUE-TEMPLATE Issue's body doesn't match any issue template. label Jan 17, 2025
@shane-t shane-t linked a pull request Jan 17, 2025 that will close this issue
Draft
7 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@shane-t shane-t

Labels
INVALID-ISSUE-TEMPLATE Issue's body doesn't match any issue template.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

test: remove MMI tests MetaMask/metamask-extension
2 participants
@shane-t @metamaskbot