You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Paper describes using an "automated method" for counting functional groups, but contains no description of it other than a reference to a German journal article from 1993 that I can't find (yet). Unclear if it is SMARTS strings or something like it, or some proprietary point-and-click software.
Groups and SMARTS strings
There are a lot of groups (217 including second order groups and group interactions)
Tables seem to describe the groups well with 1-2 example compounds per group
Most/all groups look possible with SMARTS at a glance, but quite a few look really difficult
Groups have a "priority" value, which I think is used to "pick" one group when multiple would match the same atom in a molecule.
E.g. something like "C with a bond to Cl or F" is less specific and lower priority than "C with a bond to a Cl" (I think??).
Unclear how this would work programmatically with SMARTS and might have to take the "correction" approach of just subtracting the less specific from the more specific.
Math
You are required to know the boiling point at a given pressure to estimate vapor pressure as a function of temperature.
Example calculations for several compounds in Appendix B
Slope parameter, $dB$, calculated with sum or group contributions and group interactions (a double sum of coefficients for when there are more than one of certain groups)
Equations in examples are unclear and don't match equations in body of paper always
What is the difference between "boiling point" and "boiling temperature"? They seem to be used non-interchangeably.
Summary
Overall this would be a significant undertaking because of 1) the large number of very specific SMARTS strings that would need to be created (unless the authors can help out), and 2) the major differences in how logP is calculated with this method. That is, it's not just a matter of adding a different table of SMARTS strings and coefficients! Seems probably do-able, but would want to replicate examples in Appendix B in a script first before thinking about anything else.
If we were to add another method besides SIMPOL.1, this paper would be a good one to look at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fluid.2008.04.020
volcalc
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: