You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
it just does make sense anymore with the introduction of grants, where an approver is a contributor yet hasnt contributed.
The state should make sense, it currently doesnt.
What is needed to change?
Add approvers which are the accounts responsible for approving milestones. We must also have a vote_weight (the same as before).
Remove the concept of 'contributor'. In fact this is not needed at all due to the introduction of multi chain refund_locations in the config.
In pallet grants, then we can say that we have 'approvers' not contributors and just specify the TreasuryOrigin on instantiation to handle refunds.
Alas in vote_on_milestone refactor the terminology
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
it just does make sense anymore with the introduction of grants, where an approver is a contributor yet hasnt contributed.
The state should make sense, it currently doesnt.
What is needed to change?
Add
approvers
which are the accounts responsible for approving milestones. We must also have avote_weight
(the same as before).Remove the concept of 'contributor'. In fact this is not needed at all due to the introduction of multi chain
refund_locations
in the config.In pallet grants, then we can say that we have 'approvers' not contributors and just specify the
TreasuryOrigin
on instantiation to handle refunds.Alas in vote_on_milestone refactor the terminology
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: