Enhancement: add Microsoft.Graph/Applications to provision progress

[pamelafox]

In Bicep, we can now deploy Graph objects like:

Microsoft.Graph/[email protected]

Do you think it'd be good to show that in the provisioning output? I'm not sure how you decide what to show there, since you don't show small things like RBAC roles.

Example app using it:
pamelafox/simple-flask-server-example#20

[john0isaac]

I had a similar issue with MySQL DB this was Matt's response to it.

We have a hard-coded mapping of resource type to what we display in azure_resource_types.go. #2952 is an example where we updated this previously.

@weikanglim was looking into if we could somehow generate this from the same source of truth that the portal uses, but no luck there yet.

#3167 (comment)

The team can respond whether they wanna add the graph object to the azure_resource_types.go or not.

[weikanglim]

I feel that Microsoft.Graph/applications with the application name displayed is important, we would definitely welcome a PR submission and go from there.

[weikanglim]

As a long-term note, we definitely started out in a place where we wanted to limit the amount of concepts exposed to our users as it can be overwhelming. However, it isn't easy deciding on which concepts may be most important. Some UI patterns can also help here if we feel that the experience isn't quite right.

I have a change that would introduce most resource type translations to azd (100+), upstreamed from Azure Naming Tool. We could try this out at some point in time and see how all this looks as an experiment.